Office Hours is back this Friday 8/12 2-3pm EDT. Join the pack to check it out.

The Zeitgeist – 5.8.2019

Every morning, we run the Narrative Machine on the past 24 hours worth of financial media to find the most on-narrative (i.e. interconnected and central) stories in financial media. It’s not a list of best articles or articles we think are most interesting … often far from it.

But for whatever reason these are articles that are representative of some sort of chord that has been struck in Narrative-world.


May 8, 2019 Narrative Map – US Equities

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

Renewed China trade fears send U.S. markets tumbling [UPI]

Futures fall on U.S.-China trade uncertainty [Reuters]

Global stocks slip, bonds rally as U.S.-China trade fears grow [Reuters]

Frequent readers will be familiar with our three recurring trade and tariffs arguments:

  1. The narrative on tariffs has been complacent for the last several months – coherent and positive. Investors who have a contrarian (read: negative) view of outcomes could benefit from the resulting asymmetry.
  2. If it ends up as a major market event, it is likely that traditional diversification techniques continue to work like they have historically (i.e not a ‘new’ zeitgeist).
  3. We don’t think anyone should be in the business of having those contrarian OR consensus views on the topic, because it’s a GAME OF CHICKEN. You don’t know the odds, because there aren’t any.

None of that has stopped financial media from updating their assessments of the odds on a daily basis, of course.

These are the sectors that worry Wall Street analysts the most if there’s a US-China trade war [CNBC]

None of that has stopped the sell side from pushing new ways to play the odds, either.

Goldman Sachs – Hardline Retail Stocks

UBS – Softline Retail Stocks

Cowen – Chemical Stocks

Credit Suisse – Auto Parts Stocks

Bank of America – Automobile Stocks

Needham – Semiconductor Stocks

Baird – Chemical Stocks

Let’s get trading, fellow muppets!


Data Gumbo Secures $6M in Series A Funding from Venture Arms of Leading International Oil & Gas Companies [Press Release]

HOUSTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Data Gumbo Corp., a Houston-based technology company that has developed a Blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) platform to streamline smart contracts management for industrial customers, announced today completing a $6M Series A equity funding round co-led by Saudi Aramco Energy Ventures, the venture subsidiary of Saudi Aramco, and Equinor Technology Ventures, the venture subsidiary of Equinor, Norway’s leading energy operator.

Wait, what?


Sysco’s Earnings Beat Estimates but Revenue Comes Up Shy [The Street]

I wonder why this perfunctory note scored so high on the Zeitgeist.


Americans mimic Russian disinformation tactics ahead of 2020 [The Hill]

The widening gyre is only beginning.

And this is how it widens – as always, with the best intentions.


AIG Unit Rebounds After an Overhaul [WSJ]

What is dead may never die.


Comments

  1. I’d love to take the other side of you on the widening gyre as it is sucking the life blood out of me, but you guys are so right on (and were so early to) the call. Everything - Every. Single. Thing. - widens it.

    Mueller’s report would have widened it either way: It was favorable to Trump, so the left lost its mind; had it been deleterious to Trump, the right would have. It is absolutely awful and frightening to live through this.

  2. This isn’t perfectly responsive to the present article, but I just had an interesting thought about a mechanism that might have some contribution to the development of widening gyres:

    People who disagree with you can be pretty annoying, pointing out real or imagined inconsistencies in your positions, putting words in your mouth, etc. You bump into each other every once in a while, butt heads, and maybe when you part you both feel a little worse off. This is the first order game. It can feel like a lose-lose proposition.
    The second order game is where you present a facade that is a caricature of your actual self, so exaggerated, so very annoying that the other guy decides just not to deal with you any more. They stop annoying you, you stop annoying them, win-win! In the short term, anyway. There are externalities…
    “Full hearts” is an even higher-order strategy that tries to realize a genuine, durable win-win.

    Sorry if I’m rehashing an old ET article, I promise it’s merely negligent.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

Participants

The Daily Zeitgeist

ET Zeitgeist: Raccoons Never Sleep

By Ben Hunt | May 28, 2021 | 5 Comments

Lemonade (LMND) isn’t just an insurance company. No, no … they’re an AI Company! ™.

Plus Chamath is up to his old tricks.

I hate raccoons.

Read more

Inflation as Ad Campaign

By Ben Hunt | May 24, 2021 | 0 Comments

An ET Pack member sent me this. Anyone else come across ads that directly call out inflation expectations? Would love to collect more screenshots like…

Many People Are Saying … Bitcoin is Art

By Ben Hunt | May 24, 2021 | 0 Comments

The Bitcoin Is Art thesis that I put out back in 2015 (The Effete Rebellion of Bitcoin) and recently put forward again (In Praise of…

Why Am I Reading This Now?

By Ben Hunt | May 24, 2021 | 1 Comment

Pack member Rob H. brought this up at last week’s Office Hours, and it deserves its own thread (as well as some attention from the…

Homeschooling Resources on ET Forum?

By Ben Hunt | May 24, 2021 | 0 Comments

I think a homeschooling VMPT is a natural for the ET Forum! On last week’s Office Hours conversation, ET Pack member Dan W. brought this…

ET Zeitgeist: With Enemies Like This

By Ben Hunt | May 21, 2021 | 9 Comments

This has been a bad week for Bitcoin and Bitcoin! TM alike. There’s no getting around that.

But whenever Paul Krugman and the Wall Street Journal agree on something … I want to be on the other side of that trade!

Read more

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.