Whatever It Takes

6+

Every morning, we run the Narrative Machine on the past 24 hours worth of financial media to find the most on-narrative (i.e. interconnected and central) stories in financial media. It’s not a list of best articles or articles we think are most interesting … often far from it.

But for whatever reason these are articles that are representative of some sort of chord that has been struck in Narrative-world.


Trade War Traps ECB With Bund Yields at Record Low  [Bloomberg]

The yield on 10-year German government bonds has declined to its lowest ever, reaching -0.213% on Friday. That’s almost a basis point below the previous low, reached on July 6, 2016.

ECB President Mario Draghi can expect to get grilled at the press conference about what he has left in the toolbox to counter the headwinds assailing the economy. If the bond market doesn’t like what it hears, the benchmark German yield could yet plumb new depths.

It’s the truest thing I know about the State.

What begins as emergency government action ALWAYS becomes permanent government policy.

I’m not saying this is good. I’m not saying this is bad. I’m saying that it IS.

In the summer of 2012, Mario Draghi took emergency action to save the Euro system. There wasn’t actually much action, but the WORDS and the NARRATIVE that Draghi set in motion with his “whatever it takes” speech in London was enough.

But as ALWAYS happens in an entrenched, self-interested bureaucracy, the policies designed to be part of that emergency action … the liquidity programs and the balance sheet expansion and all that goes along with pushing interest rates into negative-world … they kept going long after the emergency was past. Because there’s always another target for your bazooka. Because that’s what entrenched, self-interested bureaucracies DO.

So now here we are, where “whatever it takes” has morphed from saving the entire European project to … [checks notes] … preventing a garden-variety recession.

But as mad as I get at the mandarins in Frankfurt and Washington and Tokyo, there’s someone who bothers me even more.

From Magical Thinking

Yep, at first I was disappointed in them. But on reflection I became more and more disappointed in us.

See, the problem isn’t with the Fed. They’re going to do what solipsistic, magical thinking priest-kings have done for ten thousand years … more of THAT. More solipsism. More magical thinking. More 4 year old egomaniacal determination that their spell casting efforts are the ONLY thing that stand between us and utter ruin.

No, the bigger problem is with us. The bigger problem is that we cannot imagine a solution for our current economic and political problems that does not rely on greater and greater state-directed spell casting. Monetary policy spells not working? Well, golly, I guess our ONLY alternative is to try some fiscal policy spells. Really? That’s the best we can come up with? I understand that this is what the courtiers are going to say. But I expect more from the rest of us. I expect more from myself.

It’s time to expect more. Not from Draghi or Powell or their cultists, but from us and from me.

It’s time to expect more from the Pack.


6+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You'll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever. It's our effort to spread the word about what we're doing, and allow you to read more Epsilon Theory!

15
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Ward Good
Member
Ward Good

“Men cannot improve a society by setting fire to it: they must seek out its old virtues, and bring them back into the light.” …said Russell Kirk. It appears a lot of Jacksonian America..including me…wanted to set it all ablaze. Alas, it’s not that easy.

1+
Sean Garman
Member
Sean Garman

Of course the ECB cannot change tactics or their strategy, indeed if they ever had a strategy to begin with. There is now the institutional imperative to act by central bankers irrespective of whether acting produces the original intended result or whether it is going to be long-term harmful. Nothing is more damaging to an institutions collective psychology than being proven wrong, especially to people who are meant to be “experts” who have spent decades bouncing around academia and central banks.

Indeed they have to double-down their bet in order to be proven right because the implications of realising they are wrong, both for the institution and themselves, is too great a threat to their survival… so like a King Rat they cooperate in this game of taking temporary extraordinary action and making it a permanent reality.

1+
Rafa Mayer
Member
Rafa Mayer

My problem with expecting more from the Pack is that I never end up fitting as much stuff in the go-bag as I wanted to try and pack in. Like the crossbow, it really doesn’t fit well, even when I downgraded it to a wrist model variety. Also, do you know how much room commodities take up in your luggage? Seriously.

Oh wait…you didn’t mean pack and leave?

Never mind.

2+
BobK71
Member
BobK71

It’s the classic addiction problem, right? Continuing is not sustainable long-term, but stopping is too painful.

The more the economy is distorted in the direction of serving up luxuries to the lucky, the more painful any decline in demand will be, and the more you ‘have to’ prop up demand.

State-controlled money comes with a money-back guarantee that addiction will happen!

0
Mark Kahn
Member
Mark Kahn

I imagine it goes on for a long time (like Japan) or not – either way, it ends when it “breaks -” “it” being (ET’s brilliantly named) the narrative of central bank omnipotence, it being the ability of the market to levitate negative (or low)-rate bonds, it being markets divorced from fundamentals, it being debt levels divorced from GDP, it being zombie companies raising money at historically low rates, it being financialization “creating” earnings, it being all of IT.

And when it breaks, we get loss assignment, massive bankruptcy, deleveraging – everything that should have been allowed to happen (with less pain then) in ’08 / everything that was allowed to happen in the S&L crisis of the late ’80s.

Then, we do what we always do – and should have already done – we start anew from a better foundation. That’s this pack member’s view and suggestion – let’s get on with the pain as there is no other way to the other side except through the debris field of a debt implosion.

1+
Daren Heitman
Member
Daren Heitman

What does “get on with it” look like? A gradual but steady increase in the Fed Funds rate? Just curious how you’d define the process of getting to the other side…..

0
Mark Kahn
Member
Mark Kahn

Yes, I think the Fed needs to continue normalizing rates and its balance sheet, which will cause a large stock market selloff and all the other deleveraging/loss assignment I described (that’s what was starting to happen in December). I hate that, but the alternative is worse as we just keep blowing the financial bubbles up further.

1+
Clive Hale
Member

I’m inclined to agree with Mark K but no gov or CB us going to let it all go to hell without a scapegoat. Any volunteers out there? Or we could just keep going Japanese for as long as the printing ink doesn’t run out.
If we get the big reset it will change they world forever and a lot of folk aren’t prepared and won’t like it. The populist demonstrations in Europe will look like a picnic on a sunny day in comparison.
Or do we say okay no money in politics policy driven by achieving the best outcome for the highest number of people. Far fewer folk pissed off going that route ex the 1% ers who will lose their cosy existence.

0
Mark Kahn
Member
Mark Kahn

IMHO, we are on the Japanese path until it breaks. Who knows, Japan has done it for three decades, but then again, every economy and period is different. We could go on for years or break tomorrow. I agree with you, no CB will take us there willingly.

0
Peter Perez
Member
Peter Perez

I commented yesterday to a like minded peer in Chicago…”that I feel like I’m in a house of ill-repute”. Here we are…well hedged and killing the indexes of late, only for a Fed policy utterance that they would move to head-off the next recession. Several days of hedged blocking and tackling vaporized by THE NARRATIVE! Markets no longer ride the escalator up and elevator down, but the escalator down and the elevator up…with Powell et all as elevator men. Haul-ass, Bypass, and Re-gas!

1+
Clive Hale
Member

The difference between the US and Japan is that one of them generally runs a trade surplus which would be Trimps “rosy scenarios “

0
Paul Benjamin
Member
Paul Benjamin

Rusty hit the nail on the head a year ago plus. To break the cycle we (the Pact, the People, the Market, et al) have to accept loosing. All the stimulus (narrative and actual) is for one purpose and one purpose only. To Win!

But how do we lose without it being an existential event?

Step 1) Pull ourselves out of the black-and-white two sided debates about what should be done. The world is grey- inflation can be both good and bad (at the same time). Immigration can be both good and bad (at the same time) economic activity can be slowing and expanding (at the same time).

Disagreements are due to us choosing sides to align ourselves and by default believe the counter opinion is wrong.

Allowing for the other side to be right without believing you are wrong. Is a great first step

Step 2) By the time we get past step 1, i’ll have come up with Step 2

1+
james stewart
Member
james stewart

Depth of perception and executive power’s correlation is distorted by despotic luck. Slightly tricky.

0

The Daily Zeitgeist

Frauds and Traitors

By Ben Hunt | August 16, 2019 | 2 Comments

Throwing words like “Fraud!” and “Traitor!” around so casually … it doesn’t reveal the true frauds and the true traitors.

It makes it easier for them to hide.

Read more

When Potato Salad Goes Bad

By Ben Hunt | August 15, 2019 | 4 Comments

On Tuesday, the Macy’s narrative was “I think they can make their comps.”

On Wednesday, the Macy’s narrative was “I think they can cover their dividend.”

This is what it means for a narrative to go bad. This is what it means for a story to break.

And when a story breaks, so does the stock. Not just for a little while, but for a loooong time.

Just ask GE.

Read more

A Cartoon in Three Parts

By Rusty Guinn | August 8, 2019 | 2 Comments

Cartoons are not evil. And yet they are the engine behind the Long Now, and very much at the center of our financial Zeitgeist. What is a clear eyed, full-hearted investor and citizen to do?

Read more

The Last Chance

By Rusty Guinn | August 7, 2019 | 6 Comments

You want scarcity? Access to the upper echelons of high society? Well, say no more. It’s your very last chance to buy this most special, most fantastical, most legendary, most unattainable of whiskies.

Read more

Are You Sweet Talking Me?

By Ben Hunt | August 6, 2019 | 4 Comments

It’s my favorite part of any Batman movie … that scene where the henchman pays a visit to the crazed supervillain – the Joker is the gold standard here – and you just know that the meeting is about to go terribly, terribly awry for the thug.

It’s a funny scene in a movie.

It’s a crappy way to run a country.

Read more

The Donkey of Guizhou

By Ben Hunt | August 5, 2019 | 7 Comments

My point in relating the fable of the Donkey of Guizhou is not that I believe China is the tiger and the United States is the donkey in our current trade-war-going-to-currency-war.

My point in relating the fable of the Donkey of Guizhou is not that I believe the current United States president is a braying donkey in his “easy to win” trade-war-going-to-currency-war.

I mean … I do, but that’s not my point.

My point is that Chinese political leadership believes that they are the tiger and the current United States president is a braying donkey.

Read more

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.