When I wrote Starry Eyes and Starry Skies a few weeks back, I made the argument that adequate vocational training for just about every financial services job I could think of would take several months (at most). A few readers asked me why I didn’t think that a longer, more in-depth liberal arts education had value. They clearly didn’t read the piece.
Still, it’s worthy of an answer: I do think it has value. But its value is caught up in the conflicted mess of the three products being sold by American universities: mind-expanding liberal education, vocational training and credibility signaling. We do no service to those whose jobs will ultimately never require them to use even the most modest insights or critical thinking gained from detailed study of Dostoevsky by forcing them to do so for four or more years. We likewise do no service to those who would learn for learning’s sake and yet subject them to four years of watered down classes that have to justify their value in some vocational or competitive signaling sense against other departments or institutions.
When you try to solve for multiple problems, you are almost always solving for only one.
A few other readers who actually read the piece asked me what I thought that truncated vocational training would look like. More recently, the CEO of Presto, a hospitality technology company, posted a similar, if more general question. Specifically, he asked:
If you could redesign college education for smart people who don’t know what they want to be, what would it look like?
His answer was quite good. I just have a different take. So here’s my answer: an intensive set of three separate quarterly sessions over a period of nine months, structured not to identity what is most important but to target the fundamental modern skills that are not necessarily more easily acquired in a work-place setting, and which provide the easiest ramp for additional hard- and soft-skill development in other areas once in that professional environment. It is an important distinction, because in almost every case, the most important determinants of success will have little to do with curriculum and knowledge, and far more to do with temperament, values and natural abilities in a range of different areas.
The topics excluded in the curriculum are left out for very different reasons. You don’t include econometrics because it’s useless unless you plan to become a graduate-level economist. You don’t include a productivity software class because two weeks of Excel without a mouse in your first job will do a better job of it. You don’t include an ethics course because if you are prone to unethical behavior, it sure as hell ain’t gonna be a class that changes that.
I’m sure you’ll let me know in the comments how much you hate it.
Quarter 1, Module 1: Professional Writing
Good writing is the rarest skill among young professionals I have hired. It is also the trait shared among those who progressed quickly in accomplishment and responsibility.
- Short-form writing:
- Extracting and synthesizing key information
- Bulletized / short-form writing
- Email / slack-style
- Long-form writing:
Quarter 1, Module 2: Calculus
I’ll get the most argument on this one. But y’all, there really are a lot of jobs that benefit from understanding the calculation and implications of rates of change. You need more math than high school gives you.
- Limits, integrals and derivatives
- Differential equations
- Optimization and graph construction
Quarter 1, Module 3: Fundamental Managerial and Financial Accounting
Every graduate who might work in some kind of business or non-profit (which is, as it happens, just about all of them) should be able to read and largely understand its financial statements, and should have some sense of how to build a similar financial statement for a household or small enterprise.
- Ledgers, accounts, line items, debits and credits
- Accruals and cash
- Assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses
- Standardized structure (IS/BS/CF)
Quarter 1, Module 4: Interviewing, Public Speaking and Debate
Most university graduates are terrible extemporaneous, prepared, ad hoc and informal verbal communicators.
- Basic formal logic
- Research, preparation and performance techniques
- Interview question formulation, conducting
- Email, phone, conference call, video call, and meeting-size variable etiquette
- Practical settings
Quarter 2, Module 1: Capital Markets
You could call this corp fin, too, but importantly. the right course design here needs to emphasize far more about fund-raising, sources of capital and project/investment return evaluation, and far less about valuation techniques and grinding out WACC calculations. In short, a young professional should know what ROI means, the kinds of decisions that improve it, and the kinds of manipulation that others will practice to make it look improved. They should also know what secondary financial markets are and how they work at a high level.
- Forms, sources and costs of capital
- Returns and project evaluation
- Capital structure optimization, credit and risk
- Secondary markets
Quarter 2, Module 2: Statistics and Probability
- Conditional probabilities
- Measuring relationships, regression, optimization
- Measuring central tendency and distribution characteristics
- Interpretations, esp. applicability of generalized measures
Quarter 2, Module 3: Programming in Python
This will change at some point in the future. For now, any graduate of any post-secondary program purporting to have vocational influence should be at least proficient in the structure, syntax and methods of Python programming.
- Structure and syntax, objects and classes
- Libraries, API and packages
- Functional programming
- Data integration
- Intro to ML, NLP, Tensorflow, etc.
Quarter 2, Module 4: Modern Sectors, Industries and Trade
Macroeconomics curricula are only slightly less useless for most students than microeconomics versions. The gap left for most students by removing them, however, is a simple, if detailed survey of what kinds of companies are out there, what their business models are, how they integrate, who their vendors and customers are, how they make money and how they fund themselves.
Quarter 3, Module 1: Project / Experiment Management
The skill at organizing projects and resources is a technical one useful to almost any entry-level professional role. It is also a philosophical one that is critical to growth in managerial or leadership positions.
- Workflows and dependencies
- Timing, resource allocation
- Organizational design
- Conventions for group communication, meetings, logistical planning
- Marketing experiment design and execution
Quarter 3, Module 2: Databases and Data Analysis
Most skill with data analysis tools and techniques will be best developed in a working environment on live projects. But fundamental knowledge here is important to building those skills.
- Data classification, ordering and storage
- Data retrieval, metadata and queries
- Common data analysis techniques and packages
- Applied statistical techniques
Quarter 3, Module 3: Business Law
The first job a graduate has should not be the first time they’ve read a contract, encountered its peculiar terms of art, navigated between defined terms and a contract body, or seen disclaimers, indemnities or closing conditions.
- Torts and contracts
- Regulation, regulators and SROs
- Universal principles, esp. fraud
Quarter 3, Module 4: Hospitality
No fourth module this quarter. Instead, everyone works a food service job.
No, I’m not kidding.
Classes on sales are nonsensical gobbledygook, but the idea is right. It’s just something that can only be captured in a practical setting. If most graduates lack anything as much as they do writing and general communication skills, it is an understanding of how to respond with grace under pressure. It is the realization that one is always, always selling in every direction in any professional setting. It is a mentality that emphasizes hospitality, a much better and more comprehensive concept than client service or customer service models.
All told, with decent instructors, I’d be happy to put up a graduate of this program of equal natural abilities against a graduate of any undergraduate program in the country.
It’s unrealistic, I suppose, to consider that we will be able to break the stranglehold that signaling-based institutions have on structuring an expensive four years that functionally serves only a portion of students at all, and almost nobody well. Still, it is worthwhile for us to go through thought experiments like this, if only to perform self-evaluations, give thought to how we structure our professional education programs within our businesses, and how our own children’s educations are going.
It is also important for us to consider how we can make it feasible for a true, liberally minded, horizons-expanding education to exist without the frequently oppositional aims of signal-maximizing and vocational preparation. You won’t be surprised to hear that I think it starts younger, with less reliance on the system or with more reliance on the Pack.
Yeah, we’ve got a lot more to say about this.