Office Hours is back this Friday 8/12 2-3pm EDT. Join the pack to check it out.

What is Permissible

PDF Download (Paid Subscription Required):  What is Permissible Jamie Dimon and Mt. Kisco C
You have reached the maximum number of free, long-form articles for the month.

Please join here to read the rest of this content.

Paid Members can log in here.

To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.

Comments

  1. Well written and terrific article Rusty. Thanks.

    Although I hope we can change from within, I suspect that only the “denouement” in markets will force attention and true structural change.
    similar to the 1930’s.

    IMO, Fair to say that the Federal Reserve Board has added one more carving in their “Wall of Shame” by actively supporting (with public dollars) any and all badly run, greedy management teams.

  2. Well put, Rusty. I’m sure you’ve read Venkatesh Rao’s web series “The Gervais Principle”? I’m struck by your ability to clearly describe one of the key mechanisms of what he splits into “Powertalk” and “Babytalk”, the first being how the management classes communicate among themselves in CYA fashion, and the second being the ESG PR-type stuff.

    https://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/

  3. I am a fan of his work but haven’t seen this series. It’s now on my weekend reading list - thank you!

  4. I think that’s probably right - and part of why I think that seeking structural change is a fool’s errand, especially if we are right about the underlying causes and need to make markets into utilities. But there are not so many public companies that asset owners cannot make meaningful change on a company-by-company basis without spending effort on “structural change.”

  5. Not very sanguine…Hard for a frog to adjust the temperature of the boiling water. Best to JUMP out…The only way for this to STOP is to LEAVE…

  6. Rusty bringing fire today. Beautiful.

    I had a pure ET moment today when I read this story: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-24/bank-dividends-in-peril-with-crisis-veterans-warning-of-trouble?sref=5dE0gZJ9

    Why am I reading this now? Are the banks using their missionaries at Bloomberg to soften the ground for a sector-wide dividend cut? They’d be happy to do it. Companies want to keep the money rather than pay it to us as shareholders. But usually they get clobbered when they cut dividends. But what if you could engineer an environment where not returning money to shareholders was viewed as the prudent thing to do? How would you go about doing it? Would anyone stop them? Not their respective boards, certainly.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

Participants

The Latest From Epsilon Theory

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.