Since last week, we have received a number of requests to amplify our views on certain provisions of
Until Further Notice
To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.
Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum
Participants
The Latest From Epsilon Theory
DISCLOSURES
This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.
This is handy. Do you have any go-to examples (today or projected) for some of these. Would be cool to see a visual or list w/ companies at the 5 end points: Can Talk / Nice One / Assholes / That Sucks / Utility.
Ah Rusty, exquisite in it’s simplicity. In my opinion, some of your best work so far!
It would be great if something like this was actually possible, but my question to you is “Who will actually need a bailout with PMCCF and SMCCF riding to the rescue?” I can’t find any covenants on the Fed’s website for these programs, no restrictions on buybacks or dividends except during an optional 6-month forbearance period. No reporting requirements, no public debate or worries about a public relations nightmare, in fact FOIA has been suspended. These SPVs are entirely opaque in a way that would make Kenneth Lay, Jeffrey Skilling and Andrew Fastow blush.
As far as companies that would not qualify under these programs because they’re below investment grade, I expect the Fed to create a new vehicle for these the next time JNK or HYG take a material hit. And with BlackRock in charge of program administration, I’m sure HYG (and all FOBR or Friends of BlackRock) will be fine. Couple that with ratings agencies that are well behind the curve with respect to properly reflecting risk in the corporate credit market, and likely under significant pressure to do no further downgrades, and I think the Fed can backstop any listed company to the extent that they would never want or need a (public) bailout. Am I missing something?
I was millennial age witnessing the Resolution Trust Corp from the S&L cleanup. Sure folks were concerned that certain bidders would get too good a deal, leaving the taxpayers with something less than optimal proceeds for the risk. But at least the business/asset was in new hands. The old management had already blown it and IMO giving them a do over at taxpayer expense is worse than giving new management a shot at a windfall. Besides, today’s old management already harvested their windfall in the form of stock awards. Wouldn’t it be a tell if those execs had to spend those windfalls to get their old “jobs” back. My preference would be be if some super smart and motivated millennials buy a cast off for next to nothing and turn it into a MBA case study for all time.
You have my vote for Bailout Tzar!
The way all roads lead to the same conclusion is quite elegant and certainly is appropriate. Count me appreciative.
Well done Rusty. Now where is the Narrative Structure on this one ?
The details of the PPP Loan program (administered via the SBA) appear to be finalized. The banks issuing the 2 year loans (for which they bear zero default risk, as it is 100% guaranteed by the government) are getting 1% annual interest (revised up from the original 0.5% after the banks complained) plus loan processing fees (paid for by the government) of at least $3.5BB.
Given the headlines/articles i’ve seen written and specifically the amount of airtime the Apollo’s of the world are getting Re: needing a backstop for HYG, feels like this HAS to be coming. Question is how long will it take them to implement and when to get long HYG/JNK. Next pull back?
Didn’t take long at all, did it?