Generative AI Images and how Microsoft Doesn’t Understand the Internet

Desperate_Yuppie, who goes by @Iron_Yuppie on Twitter or X or whatever you want to call that website, is a long-time Epsilon Theory reader who participates actively in our online community of thousands of paid subscribers – The Epsilon Theory Forum. The Forum is honestly one of the best things on the interwebs today, a safe space for full-hearted people to voice their concerns and hopes and observations about today’s world without the emotional cudgel of cancellation or the emotional crutch of an echo chamber. You know … what social media should be! And yes, it’s for paid subscribers only, which is how we keep the trolls at bay. Enjoy this sample of what you’ll find on the Forum (there are hundreds of active threads just like this), and if this sounds like your kind of place, please join us!

As with all of our guest contributors, Desperate_Yuppie’s post may not represent the views of Epsilon Theory or Second Foundation Partners, and should not be construed as advice to purchase or sell any security.

Last week Bing launched their AI image creation engine, powered by Dall-E 3, and it was a big hit. Hilarity, followed by panic, followed by even more hilarity, ensued.

For those of you with healthy and productive lives you almost certainly missed this as it happened on TwitterX. Here’s the synopsis:

Dall-E 3 is a generative AI that creates art (but not Art :tm:) in multiple styles based on your prompts. If you want a digital art picture of a capybara trick-or-treating in an American suburb it’ll make it for you. See:

Neat, right? There’s just one tiny, minor, hardly-worth-mentioning problem…

The people at Bing have no idea how the internet works.

Almost immediately people started having some fun with this new toy and Twitter was flooded with pictures that were meant to both entertain and offend. SpongeBob apparently did 9/11. Kirby (a Nintendo character) also was responsible for 9/11, according to photographic evidence I saw. This particular trend started who knows where, but a small time tech journo heard about it and that’s when things really took off. This hectoring scold was so incensed by people having fun that he decided to start prompting Bing to make offensive images, then he wrote about it. He then went so far as contacting Nintendo to ask them how they felt about these sorts of images. For those of you keeping score at home here was the progression:

Hears people are making these offensive images

—> Goes and makes his own offensive images

—> Gets offended

If you think political journalism has been captured by activist hacks you should see the state of tech journalism.

Anyway, Bing engineers worked to shut down the potential trigger words in the prompts so Kirby could no longer do 9/11.

But of course the internet was undeterred by such modest barriers. What followed was exactly what any sentient observer would have expected.

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce wearing stereotypical Native American headdresses. Taylor Swift in an SS uniform (many of these), Taylor Swift as a Roman centurion at the crucifixion, OJ Simpson jumping out of the woods at Taylor Swift…while she’s in an SS uniform. You’re getting the idea, right?

Swift is nothing if not careful about her NIL, and she probably doesn’t love the idea of having pictures of her as a Nazi circulating the internet. So who precisely does she talk to about getting this sort of thing pulled down? Who’s responsible when this all goes from harmless trolling to something a lot darker? Because remember, you can choose the style of your pictures and photorealistic is one of those choices.

That lovely young lady is not real. She’s the result of the prompt ‘young Latina woman working in a physics lab, photorealistic’. We should pause for a moment and reflect on how unbelievable it is that this technology exists and at how rapidly it went from glitchy and weird to simply working well. It’s quite something.

But see this is where it gets very messy very fast. All those trollish pictures I mentioned above were done in the style of digital art, basically a Cartoon. I suspect the people making them knew better than to ask for photorealistic images of actual, recognizable public figures. But not everyone will be so restrained.

Three days before an election a local newspaper runs a picture of the incumbent Congressman and his young female staffer looking a little too close. He loses the tight race and his reputation is ruined. A week later it comes out that the image was AI generated and had been leaked to the paper through various opposition groups. Where does he go to get his job back? How does he rebuild his reputation and his standing in the public eye?

The answer, according to Bing and every other company involved in this work is basically the shoulder shrug emoji because nobody has bothered to actually game this all out.

In the rush to get a product to market nobody thought about what happens when said product is in widespread, uncontrolled use. [Insert Ian Malcolm quote here] What are the laws governing this stuff? If I ask AI to make me a photorealistic picture of some celebrity doing something wrong-but-believable, who does he/she sue? For sure not me, because I didn’t make the image. In fact I can’t use the image for commercial purposes because it is by definition not mine. So does the celebrity sue Microsoft? What about the half dozen other companies that are doing this work? If Bing locks down prompts maybe I find a loophole on Stable Diffusion XL or Midjourney. This is chaos being unleashed on the public and all because the leaders of government and tech couldn’t be troubled to think five minutes into the future. Sound familiar?

Bonus points for anyone who gets this :point_up_2:t2:

To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.


  1. The Greek Goddess Niobe weeping over the loss of her children to social media/smart phones/AI?

  2. Avatar for bhunt bhunt says:

    It’s all Deep Fakes from here.

  3. Avatar for 010101 010101 says:

    Epimetheus’s wife. It seems so obvious in hindsight!

  4. In the vicinity, but don’t look backwards but rather forwards (and be haunted by it).

  5. Avatar for 010101 010101 says:

    Priam’s beautiful daughter that cheats Apollo?

  6. Eve mother of Cain, Abel, and Seth. Weeping over what her descendants are up to.
    If not, Pandora looking for Hope in the box that unleashed evils upon the world.

  7. Avatar for 010101 010101 says:

    “But the woman took off the great lid of the jar with her hands and scattered, all these and her thought caused sorrow and mischief to men. Only Hope remained there in an unbreakable home within under the rim of the great jar, and did not fly out at the door; for ere that, the lid of the jar stopped her, by the will of Aegis-holding Zeus who gathers the clouds.”

    Hesiod Op. et Di. Lines 94-100

    Pandora does not act of her free will. She is Zeus’s punishment to confuse mankind. Ancient satire. It is perhaps interesting how recent narrative changes from the original.

  8. Ping Pong. Foosball. Fly fishing. Hunting. Back packing. Skiing of all sorts. Hiking. Rollerblading. Trail running. Mountain biking. Travel. Bird watching. Etc. etc……
    Dang, and to think I’m missing out on all this wonderful digital imagery by wasting my time on other pursuits.
    Like media and politicians, perhaps don’t give them more oxygen than they deserve

  9. Your response is precisely why I included the last image, as I anticipated at least one person would find this whole thing to be a time-wasting triviality.

  10. It can be fun if it takes no time though, like @010101 might have been able to do. Top of mind for me by contrast:

    The dude top left is wondering about his strangely hypertrophic deltoid, whilst the lacriminally abundant nymphette appears unaware of her pending wardrobe malfunction,
    The audience goes wild

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

10 more replies


Avatar for bhunt Avatar for chudson Avatar for handshaw Avatar for Zenzei Avatar for 010101 Avatar for jpclegg63 Avatar for Desperate_Yuppie Avatar for RobMann Avatar for Wesley_Whitehead Avatar for Victor_K Avatar for Kaiser147 Avatar for kendallweihe Avatar for epigone1971

The Latest From Epsilon Theory


This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.