Office Hours this Friday, 1/21, 2-3pm EST. Check out Forum for dial-in info

The Rake

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website,&nbs
You have reached the maximum number of free, long-form articles for the month.

Please join here to read the rest of this content.

Paid Members can log in here.

To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.

Comments

  1. How about no tax deduction for interest on an amount of the company’s debt equal to the aggregate of the previous 5 or 10 years stock buybacks. And yes, I’m looking at you IBM.

  2. Again, tax managent stock options as immediate income at current value of options when granted and again when exorcised. Get rid of capital gains treatment for stock options.

  3. Avatar for jlmh jlmh says:

    How about no stock buybacks?
    Managment can have options, preferably with long dated vesting. Does align with shareholders, interest in a well performing stock. But no possibility of gaming the system ( that way) by giving company money to people who do not want to be shareholders.

  4. Personally, I want every member of the board of directors to own some of the stock. Not sure how to accomplish this w/out equity compensation. I also think that in the case of company founders, there may need to be an exception to the CEO/Chairman rule. Without an exception would there be too much of a disincentive for going public in the first place?

    What if buybacks were not allowed unless the company paid out a certain % as dividends in that calendar year? Say 50%? Also, all shareholder communication about buybacks should include full disclosure, gross amount, mgmt stock based compensation, other tax true up games, net amount.

  5. Ben - suggestions 1 through 3 take care of the board, but what of the ‘managers’? If stock-based compensation is truly compensation for hitting agreed-upon goals, then payment should follow into the next fiscal year.

    First, limit by law stock-based compensation to 10% of total cash compensation, and second, issue the stock each pay period. [ Add the current stock value issued into the period earnings, tax it based on the individual’s tax schedule, then remove the value of the stock - like taxing a company car. The company adds the value of the car to cash compensation for that payroll period, they then tax it, then remove the vehicle value. I hated it when I had a company car, but I also understood the taxing principle.]

    No more hulking huge stock awards, all at once, and the actual award is spread out over the year after it is earned. The employee can take possession of the shares each pay period, or let them accrue. And the only way this is going to happen is by law, because there will be serious push-back. But someone, somewhere, is going to have to draw a line in the sand to stop these abuses.

  6. I own a lot of stocks and don’t have a clue how much the executives are making. I’m sure I would be displeased if I did. If ROE is ok, most of us figure everything else is ok. Perhaps if the information were a clear line item and stockholders were allowed to express their view with some authority, it would help the situation.

  7. The proxy statement will tell you how managers are compensated. This excerpt from the 2019 Norfolk Southern proxy statement provides a clue.

    From the 2019 proxy statement: “Norfolk Southern’s goal is to achieve an operating ratio less than 65 percent by 2020 and double-digit compound annual earnings per share growth over the plan period (page 30)." Nothing in there about revenue or volume growth. Mgt is incented to get the OR down and EPS up.

  8. Jamie isn’t taking people’s money at the point of a gun. Investors are literally giving it to him. Then complaining, “there ought to be a law”.

  9. Ben, If I have a clear understanding of the stock buy-back extravaganza, it has been facilitated by the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy which allowed credit worthy (?) borrowers to replace equity with debt. Trying to nullify the actions of one government agency with more government regulation seems contrary to the ethos of the pack. I am not sure how to do this but the very first step is to clip the wings of the Fed. It is time to recognize that there is a business cycle that must run its courses. Safe spaces only exist in the halls of academia where these millionaire professors belong not trying to manage the lives of working class Americans. There is plenty of talent here at Epsilon Theory so a good start is for all of us trying to flee the flock to start thinking outside the box. To quote Buckmeister Fuller, “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” You have helped us all take the first step in pushing back against the Nudgers, we need to come up with solutions that don’t involve making the bureaucracy more powerful.

  10. Avatar for glarri glarri says:

    Great comment.
    P.S. I think his name is spelt “Buckminster Fuller”.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

Participants

The Latest From Epsilon Theory

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.