Taiwan is now Arrakis

36+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You’ll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever.


He who controls the spice controls the universe.


Yep, that’s the plot of Dune, by Frank Herbert.

It is, in fact, the plot of the entire Dune series of books, one of the ur-texts of modern science fiction. There’s this galactic empire, see, and interstellar travel requires access to a certain narcotic drug, colloquially called “spice”, which only exists on one barren world – Arrakis. So if you want to control the empire, you have to control the supply of spice. And if you want to control the supply of spice, you have to control Arrakis.

I thought about all this when I read this little gem in the aftermath of Intel’s self-immolation last week … you know, the earnings announcement where this crown jewel of American innovation and strength told us that they had decided to financialize themselves into oblivion. Or as I like to call it, “pull a GE”.


TSMC gets large Intel chip order, Apple R&D plant (Seeking Alpha)

Taiwan-based newspaper Commercial Times reports that Intel has ordered 6nm chips from TSMC for next year.

The unprecedented Intel order would reportedly include 180,000 wafers, only slightly behind the raised 200K order from AMD, major TSMC client and Intel rival.

TSMC’s leading-edge capacity is now fully-booked for the first half of next year.

In other news for the pure-play foundry, Economic Daily News says Apple is setting up a display tech R&D plant within TSMC.


The world’s principal supplier of semiconductors – the spice of OUR global empire – is now Taiwan.

Forget about Hong Kong. Forget about the Uighurs. Forget about the virus. Forget about the Trade Deal. Forget about the South China Sea. Forget about all the reasons you’ve been told that the United States should or could be at odds with China.

And by forget, I don’t mean that you should really forget. What I mean is that none of these reasons really matter anymore. None of these reasons are spice. None of these reasons are the supply of semiconductors – the sine qua non of modern global power.

There is no future where the United States can both maintain its existential national interests and allow the world’s principal supplier of semiconductors to come under the direct political control of China.

And there is no future where China can both maintain its existential national interests and allow the world’s principal supplier of semiconductors to remain outside its direct political control.

Thanks a lot, Intel. Thanks a lot, Bob Swan. Thanks a lot, Jack Welch. Thanks a lot, all you Wall Street wizards of financialization.

Taiwan is now Arrakis. It’s now the most important country on earth. And we WILL fight over it.


36+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You'll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever. It's our effort to spread the word about what we're doing, and allow you to read more Epsilon Theory!

Notify of
18 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Thomas Brophy
Thomas Brophy
12 days ago

Interesting, TSMC is looking for land right now in the Phoenix-area for a huge manufacturing plant.

Nicholas Allen
Nicholas Allen
11 days ago
Reply to  Thomas Brophy

Tariffs FTW I guess?

michael gjerde
michael gjerde
12 days ago

We are Duned!

Eric Holmes
Eric Holmes
12 days ago

Ha! I just finished reading Dune yesterday; it’s been over 30 years since the last time I read it.

It is amazing how we find so many short-sighted ways to put ourselves at a long term disadvantage.

Good thing Taiwan is in such a defensible location….

james stewart
james stewart
12 days ago

This is somewhat of a departure from Moore’s Law.

Victor K
Victor K
11 days ago
Reply to  james stewart

Back in the late 60’s, I was an assembler language programmer on a 16 bit 64 KB Varian 620i. It was the size of a small refrigerator. Most programming errors (bugs) were initialization or reinitialization flag flaws. These flags were usually set with a single bit in one byte of core (ram).
Yesterday, my grandson showed me his toy camera which had a 32 GB mini-SD card smaller than my little fingernail. I don’t code anymore, but I would suspect flags today are still set with only a few bits in a byte. So I would suspect the real power (spice) will be manipulation of the flags, not the flag holders.
At this point, BenH might be thinking exactly right, it’s not about the supply, it’s about the backdoor intercept loop that only insiders are aware.

Victor K
Victor K
11 days ago
Reply to  Victor K

(Interrupt loop)

Eric
Eric
11 days ago
Reply to  Victor K

Can you expand on the end there? Are you speaking metaphorically or literally? That is, do you mean it matters how the actual chips can be manipulated by state actors?

james stewart
james stewart
11 days ago
Reply to  Eric

The users of the circuits can indirectly be utilised.

It is a food chain.

Victor K
Victor K
11 days ago
Reply to  Eric

Yes – manipulated. An interrupt is one way A signals B. Since there are a lot of different signal sources, each source has a different ID. B has to know what A’s ID is in order to do an ‘if ID on, then goto’ instruction. This latter instruction is looped, so B is always testing for A. In my days, these operations were done by sequential executions of instructions (bytes) in core. These days the chips run some things autonomously e.g. graphic accelerators

ike
ike
12 days ago

Maybe we can ‘worm’ our way in.

Eric
Eric
12 days ago

Two things embedded in this piece that are worthy of further thought, IMO:

(1) if the world’s “most important commodity” is now information (yes, I know – oil is still foundational) than computer processors and say, search algorithms, are of strategic importance themselves (what you’ve said, obviously, with this entire piece and comparison to Dune) — truly living in an age of information though, processors and tech can change the balance of power instantly, like a digital Dreadnought, and

(2) the great, overarching, slow-motion story of the age is the conflict between the nation-state and non-state actors. This instance puts this idea in stark relief as corporations that are not constrained by national boundaries or dictates can cause “problems” for countries.

Just some thoughts.

Nicholas Allen
Nicholas Allen
11 days ago

Well, “principal supplier of semiconductors” can be a transient thing. There’s still a lot of semiconductor manufacturing in the US, in Germany, and in other places, and while the percentage of semiconductors made in the US may have dropped significantly with Intel’s transition, Intel hasn’t been making competitive products for a few years now.

Furthermore, China has been maintaining its existential national interests with the world’s principal supplier[s] of semiconductors outside its direct political control for quite some time now. Why would they suddenly decide that a), that had to change soon, and b), rather than just stealing IP and DIYing it, they had to push the giant red button?

I think the article’s way overstating how big a deal this is, but I guess time will tell.

james stewart
james stewart
10 days ago
Reply to  Nicholas Allen

Telelogical control of the supplied chips is the objective, not simply supply.

Nicholas Allen
Nicholas Allen
9 days ago
Reply to  james stewart

Does mainland China somehow exert design control over Taiwanese manufacturers?

james stewart
james stewart
9 days ago
Reply to  Nicholas Allen

There’s the rub.

Carl Richards
Carl Richards
10 days ago

It’s a strange new world. My neighbor (I live in a suburb of Houston) has been with Fluor(FLR) engineering and construction for 35 years. In the fall last year, was promoted in charge of Asia. He was 2nd in Asia before that working out of the Philippines, in process to move to Shanghai in January. About 8 weeks ago, FLR brought him back to Houston and shut down Asian operations. Expected some scaling back, did not expect just leave. Granted, they have made one misstep after another in the last 5 years, but Trump was supposed to change the world for them. Crazy how fast things change.

Clark Venable
Clark Venable
1 day ago

The Daily Zeitgeist

Deep Sociopathy

By Ben Hunt | August 6, 2020 | 6 Comments

Is murder bad? Hmm, I dunno. What are the chances I will be caught and what price will I pay if that happens? If the odds are high enough and the price steep enough, then yeah, I guess THAT would be bad. But the act of murder itself? I mean, I’m sure whoever I murdered – if I were to murder someone, that is, because I really don’t think you can prove that I did – was getting in the way of something that was very important to me. When you really think about it, they were doing the bad thing! Why do you ask?

Welcome to the world of commodity trade finance.

Read more

Overserved

By Ben Hunt | July 20, 2020 | 13 Comments

Everyone is in a tizzy about day traders and Robinhood. “Ooooh, they’re going to have such a hangover when the bubble pops.”

Pffft. They’ll be fine.

The investors facing a hangover are small family offices, plied with endless offerings of fee-heavy SPVs and SPACs by multi-billion dollar asset managers.

Read more

Snip!

By Ben Hunt | July 16, 2020 | 5 Comments

Both Trump and Biden have proposed $2 trillion spending plans for next year, confirming exactly what we wrote last December. To the dollar. To the word.

We can’t always write tomorrow’s headlines today. But we do try!

Read more

An Advantageous Contagion

By Rusty Guinn | July 14, 2020 | 17 Comments

Sometimes good news comes from unexpected places.

And sometimes it’s best just to go with it.

Read more

The Lost Art of the Jawbone

By Rusty Guinn | July 7, 2020 | 4 Comments

Market propaganda used to be an art form, I tell you! What happened to us?

The transformation of capital markets into political utilities happened.

Read more

The Lystrosaurus

By Rusty Guinn | June 17, 2020 | 12 Comments

There is practically no information in knowing that everybody is talking about something. There is some information in knowing that everybody is using the same language to talk about something.

But there is a lot of value in knowing that people and publications with no underlying connection are simultaneously inspired to use the same language to talk about different angles of the same issue.

Read more

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.