Yesterday, one of Softbank’s largest portfolio companies – Katerra – filed for bankruptcy.
Katerra was at the heart of the relationship between Softbank and Greensill, and I think it’s the most viable path by which the Greensill fraud and financial crimes can be shown to be Softbank fraud and financial crimes.
You can read our full take on Greensill and Softbank here …
… but the skinny is this:
in 2019, Softbank put ~$3 billion into Greensill, turning it into the Vision Fund’s private bank. In 2020, Greensill lent Softbank portfolio company Katerra $435 million. When Katerra ran into trouble, Greensill wrote off the $435 million loan in exchange for 5% of common equity. LOL. A $435 million senior secured loan – which had been packaged and sold to Credit Suisse – was exchanged for a 5% equity position in a bankrupt company.
Credit Suisse has announced that they are filing suit against Softbank over this and all of the other Softbank/Greensill shenanigans. And in the WSJ article describing the Katerra bankruptcy filing, you can see how Softbank is going to try and spin this (all caps mine).
When Katerra ran into financial difficulties last year, Greensill forgave the loan.
SoftBank, in turn, invested $440 million into Greensill, EXPECTING THE MONEY TO GO TO CREDIT SUISSE’S INVESTORS.
Instead, Greensill put the proceeds of the SoftBank investment in a bank it owned in Bremen, Germany, according to a bankruptcy administrator’s report. The report said Greensill had used money it received from SoftBank, including the $440 million, to boost its bank’s capital position and fund Greensill’s overall operations.
The Softbank defense is going to be that their back door pay-off to Greensill for forgiving the Katerra loan was really intended to be a back door pay-off for Credit Suisse, but that rascal Lex just kept the money. Who knew!
As always, the best way to rob a bank is to own a bank.
Softbank seems to be what ET calls a raccoon. Many of Softbank’s investments don’t pan out. There appears to be no logic to the investments except spraying money and hoping some of it sticks and grows. They always seem to be looking for something that will be the “next big thing” (i.e. have more greater fools) than looking for a useful concept and nurturing the idea and the investment along.