Epsilon Theory Logo

ET Election Index: The First Debate

Rusty Guinn

June 27, 2019·0 comments·et election index

Debate coverage claims to assess candidate performance and identify winning moments. But the actual media narrative reveals something different: certain candidates and issues are being systematically amplified while others are buried, regardless of what actually happened on stage. The question isn't who performed best—it's which storylines media outlets decided to tell.

• Warren's presence dominated coverage in a way that erased actual debate dynamics. Her language appeared in nearly every narrative cluster about the debate, not because her performance was universally praised, but because media were constructing her as the central figure. This happened despite mixed reviews of her actual performance.

• Some moments that captivated the internet barely registered in media narratives. Beto's unprompted Spanish response generated memes and comedic reactions, yet it remained peripheral to the actual story being told about the debate. Technical difficulties received similar treatment—dismissed as quirky side issues despite disrupting the event itself.

• Specific economic and social issue framings dominated coverage independent of candidate emphasis. Language about border detention, gender equality, and an economy "not working for everyone" appeared consistently across coverage. These weren't naturally emerging from debate discussion—they were the narrative spine media chose.

• Some candidates got repositioned entirely through coverage choices. Tulsi Gabbard's pre-debate media footprint shifted noticeably. Her coverage became more aligned with a particular narrative about military and police action, suggesting media found a frame that worked.

• The pattern suggests media outlets weren't reporting what happened—they were selecting which version of what happened would reach voters. If this is how coverage operates, what determines which narratives get amplified and which get buried? And what are voters actually learning about candidates versus learning about what media decided to emphasize?

Subscribe Today to Read More

Unlock instant access to this and hundreds of other evergreen essays that explore the world of narrative through hard science and human wisdom.

  • Make more informed decisions as an investor and citizen.
  • See through the nudges of Big Politics and Big Media.
  • Become a better consumer of news.
  • Maintain your autonomy of mind in a swarm of narratives.
  • Join a community of more than 100,000 truth-seekers.

Looking for Deeper Insights?

Unlock exclusive market intelligence, trade ideas, and member-only events tailored for investment professionals and active investors with Perscient Pro.

VISIT PRO
Spiral
et election index

Comments

Start the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.