Epsilon Theory Logo

Pricing Power (pt. 2) - Intellectual Property

Ben Hunt

February 7, 2019·1 comment·In Brief

The hedge fund titans of the 2000s commanded premium fees because they were perceived as superhuman investors. Today, those same men still exist and still run sophisticated operations. Yet no one believes in their pricing power anymore. Meanwhile, quantitative firms with mediocre recent performance are thriving. The difference isn't talent or results. It's whether the market believes the IP fits the current story about how value is created.

  • The mythology switched without warning. A decade ago, human genius was the castle wall that justified premium fees. Soros, Druckenmiller, Einhorn, Lampert and their peers were legendary. The narrative shifted, and now the same people operate as "family offices," which means their business models collapsed.
  • Performance became irrelevant to the story. Quant funds are posting mediocre returns but maintaining assets and pricing power. Discretionary managers posting similar returns are hemorrhaging clients and fee pressure. The investment results are identical. The business outcomes are entirely different.
  • The zeitgeist is what makes IP defensible. If your intellectual property fits the current market narrative about what matters, it's worth premium fees. If it doesn't fit the story everyone tells about the industry, it doesn't matter how good it actually is. No one believes the castle walls exist.
  • Client-facing businesses face a different trap. Robo-advisors looked like the solution to margin compression. The problem is they cost north of 400 dollars to acquire each client, and they have zero stickiness. When markets correct, there's no human relationship to hold investors in place. High acquisition cost plus low loyalty is a death sentence.
  • Depth beats breadth when pricing power matters. Most advisory firms try to use technology to acquire more clients. The actual opportunity is using better conversations and authentic content to keep the clients you have closer and longer. That's where the margins live in a disrupted business.

Subscribe Today to Read More

Unlock instant access to this and hundreds of other evergreen essays that explore the world of narrative through hard science and human wisdom.

  • Make more informed decisions as an investor and citizen.
  • See through the nudges of Big Politics and Big Media.
  • Become a better consumer of news.
  • Maintain your autonomy of mind in a swarm of narratives.
  • Join a community of more than 100,000 truth-seekers.

Looking for Deeper Insights?

Unlock exclusive market intelligence, trade ideas, and member-only events tailored for investment professionals and active investors with Perscient Pro.

VISIT PRO
Spiral
inflation topic
In Brief

Comments

fvc's avatar
fvcabout 7 years ago

Market downturn?

“Run Away! Run Away… :)” {Apologies to Monty Python}

Perhaps a way for robo-advisors to stop knee jerk sell actions by clients is behavioural “nudges” like exit fees or phased withdrawals to keep the investor on track. The problem given past fee excesses by the industry this will look very self serving. Another approach are loyalty bonuses but this will eat margins. Nevertheless, you are right Ben given how much money has flown into passive at the market valuation tops, the next correction will test investor resolve and market liquidity. We might see an “Beast of Caerbannog” asset fire sale spiral in stocks widely held in indices.

Family owned stock with poor free float, not in indices as they do not aid index companies create ETF product or indices, may be better havens when market crunch hits.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...

bhunt's avatarfvc's avatar
1 reply

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.