Epsilon Theory Logo

Notes from the Diamond #9: How About Never

David Salem

February 3, 2020·4 comments·In Brief

Organizations hide corruption far better than outsiders can detect it. Years of intensive scrutiny, analysis, and due diligence still fail to reveal what insiders know. The question isn't whether you can find the rot before trusting an organization. It's what you're willing to bet when you know you probably can't.

• The 2017 Astros won a World Series using systematically stolen signs. Despite years of close external analysis of the franchise, nobody from outside discovered it until a former player broke the silence two years later.

• This isn't unique to baseball. Ken Fisher's investment firm grew to $100 billion in assets under management while allegedly harboring fundamental character problems at its core. Extensive diligence by sophisticated allocators missed what was apparently there all along.

• The Boston Red Sox ownership praised their GM as the permanent leader, then fired him 62 days later. Months after that reversal, they discovered their World Series-winning manager had broken rules as an Astro, forcing another reversal.

• When organizations don't enforce basic standards of integrity at the moment they matter most, the damage compounds. Late accountability looks identical to no accountability, except worse, because it undermines everything achieved in between.

• If the most closely watched and intensely analyzed institutions still hide foundational corruption, what assumptions should you make about the ones you don't watch as carefully? What should you actually trust in that condition?

Subscribe Today to Read More

Unlock instant access to this and hundreds of other evergreen essays that explore the world of narrative through hard science and human wisdom.

  • Make more informed decisions as an investor and citizen.
  • See through the nudges of Big Politics and Big Media.
  • Become a better consumer of news.
  • Maintain your autonomy of mind in a swarm of narratives.
  • Join a community of more than 100,000 truth-seekers.

Looking for Deeper Insights?

Unlock exclusive market intelligence, trade ideas, and member-only events tailored for investment professionals and active investors with Perscient Pro.

VISIT PRO
Spiral
In Brief

Comments

plagueofcustom's avatar
plagueofcustomabout 6 years ago

This is excellent, I appreciate the fearless moral clarity.


merkava18's avatar
merkava18about 6 years ago

Another mind-expanding column, Rusty. I hope George F. Will is a subscriber. His towering intellect and knowledge of baseball would appreciate your insight, from once suggesting that the proliferation of new and trendy food times should have the Home Plate ump shout “Das Gustibus” instead of “Play Ball” as the last two words of the National Anthem to his observations in Men at Work, a keen insight into Tony LaRussa, Tony Gwynn, Orel Hirsheiser and Cal Ripken Jr. have stood the test of time. Oh yeah and one last thing as Columbo used to say. I think Joe Maddon is a genius, given what he was able to do with the Rays during his tenure here. Management bought into it and nobody has ever delivered more bang for the buck, except perhaps Billy Beane…


dsalem's avatar
dsalemabout 6 years ago

Thanks, Eric. I don’t know if fearless is apt here. But to the extent Note #9 plus others in the series shed useful light on perceived moral failings, credit for powering that light should be given primarily to ET’s guiding spirits, Messrs. Hunt and Guinn.


dsalem's avatar
dsalemabout 6 years ago

Thanks for your comments, Bob. 'Tis interesting to note that Mr. LaRussa has been credibly accused of having orchestrated during his tenure as Chisox manager impermissible sign stealing similar to what the '17 Astros executed. One wonders whether and to what extent Mr. Will has modified his highly favorable assessment of LaRussa since the publication of “Men At Work” in light of more recent revelations respecting LaRussa’s corner-cutting methods. FWIW, I still think highly of LaRussa as a baseball strategist and on-field manager, albeit less highly than I did when “Men At Work” was published initially in 1990.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum...

dsalem's avatarmerkava18's avatarplagueofcustom's avatar
4 replies

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor's individual circumstances and objectives.