We are all MMTers (Still)

17+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You’ll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever.


I don’t think it would be especially insightful for us to point out that everybody knows everybody knows stimulus talks are what market participants are paying attention to. At this point, I think the idea that this is common knowledge is, well, common knowledge.

We did, however, think that it would be interesting to see how different patterns of language were more or less common among stimulus-related news reports. In other words, we thought it would be fascinating to see which Fiat News expression of “what the stimulus is really about” was the most connected and which was the least.

The network graphs below – produced using software from our friends at Quid – show articles referencing “stimulus” language since October 1. A dot is an article. A “cluster” designated by color and proximity indicates highly similar language, as does a line between two dots. North/south and east/west have no meaning other than proximity. The most connected dots and clusters are those which demonstrate the most similar and connected language. For each graph below, the bold-faced lines and dots reflect those which also reference the language of a range of secondary topics (e.g. families, the unemployed, markets, etc.) as highlighted in the graph’s title.


Fiscal Stimulus is About American Families

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

Fiscal Stimulus is About Small Businesses

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

Fiscal Stimulus is About Financial Markets

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

Fiscal Stimulus is About the Unemployed

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

If I were to ask you, “In which of those graphs does it feel like the bold-faced dots and lines are the most connected to the overall structure of the graph”, I suspect I could account for most of the answers with one of the following:

1) They all seem pretty close; or

2) Maybe the “About the unemployed” map by a little bit.

And that’s correct. Qualitatively, which is to say intuitively, and quantitatively, based on our measures of narrative attention. In short, there are a LOT of missionaries out there trying to tell you what prospective stimulus is about and what other parties are trying to make it about. It hasn’t coalesced into a single narrative structure, so far as we can tell.

But what is fiscal stimulus absolutely, positively not about? If you answered any of “the deficit”, “the debt”, “small government” or “the budget”, you are today’s big winner.


Fiscal Stimulus is About the Deficit

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory


When (or, y’know, if) the election concludes peacefully and the turn of the calendar arrives, you will read a lot of predictions about what from this insane dumpster fire of a year will become an essentially permanent feature of our world. Want a sure bet?

It’s this.

It’s budgets-don’t-matter-anymore-for-countries-who-can-print-currency narratives.

It’s MMT from either party and both at once, from capitalists and anti-capitalists alike.



17+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You'll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever. It's our effort to spread the word about what we're doing, and allow you to read more Epsilon Theory!

Notify of
10 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick Clegg
1 month ago

This alternate reality reality was pointed out by ET thru another Quid screen about 2 years ago. I think it was “The Dog That Didn’t Bark”. I had noticed during 2018 that no one ever seemed to mention the growing deficit as the Tax Cut exploded it. That post awakened the power of Narrative to drive behavior for me. Any thoughts from the Pack about which Missionary finally says the obvious, and hurtles this Narrative into the abyss?

Brian Scaletta
1 month ago
Reply to  Patrick Clegg

I’m not sure there will be a Missionary that says “Stimulus” should be called “Debt Support”, “V” looks more like “L” or “K”, or in my best Inigo voice “QE, I don’t think it means what you think it means.” Deficits, Debt and QE are now permanent fixtures, trying to extinguish any one of them would cause capital destruction. It feels like the Missionaries (Central Banks, Government) parade out daily telling us to get on the inflation/MMT train. Was the GFC of 2007/8 an event rather than Missionary driven?

Farmer Don
1 month ago

As I recall, the last President that talked seriously about the deficit was Ronald Reagan, and he was an actor by trade.

Mike
1 month ago
Reply to  Rusty Guinn

the smartest man I knew (RIP) used to tell me that we shouldn’t obsess about the deficit so much as “we owe it to ourselves.” This may have been true back when he said it but the ever growing scale of foreign owned IOUs may have made him rethink things

Desperate_Yuppie
1 month ago

An adjacent point to this note would be the following observation:

As Ben noted back in 2016, Trump breaks us because we changed from a cooperation game to a competition game. But additionally, Trump allows others to break us in the future by devaluing a former currency once held as electorally important, namely consistency. John Kerry was absolutely savaged because of his Iraq War flip-flop. In a race as close as that one you could argue it cost him the election. By today’s standards that line of attack seems quaint. So now with consistency being valued at a lot less the politicians who would have formerly been against a print-our-way-out approach have almost no incentive to hew to that ideology. Certain things have very little credible opposition left, and MMT will soon be one of them. Sure, in 2022 when the Harris administration uses it as the reasoning behind some spending program the usual cast of characters will object, but given the power to magically conjure anything they want will be too tempting when they’re eventually back in charge. A decade from now the anti-MMT crowd will be made up of a dozen Libertarians working at Cato and the six remaining pro Ron Paul bloggers left alive. It’ll be just another fixture in economic life. Us late Gen-Xers and early Millennials will sit around a carbon-neutral campfire and reminisce about the times before Jay Powell’s face was on the $250 bill.

Mike
1 month ago

damnit, why did I waste all that time studying Keynesian economics… I could have skipped 50% of it and developed a new hobby or something

Justin Nearing
10 days ago

“The problem with gravity is that it always works.”

“The story of Pandora’s Box is much more compelling if the protagonist had no choice but to open it.”

MMT, to me, sounds like a relatively fringe theory latched on to by economists trying to Narrative Control the Pandora’s Box of QE. The narrative being that “We are in control.”

And in many ways they do have control, but when push comes to shove their only recourse is more stimulus. That was the price of QE, for better or for worse.

We are all in agreement that this is the new reality. The difference is whether or not you believe that the economy has hit escape velocity. Because gravity always works, every time, no matter how many clever tricks we’ve pulled to keep the ball in the air.

Peter
9 days ago

According to the Betting markets, it appears that either Brainard or Yellen will be Biden’s choice for Treasury Secretary. Now Fed officials will meet with Former Fed officials to figure out how much to spend? Is there a more clear signal that Biden plans to “Just Print Money” to support massive Budget Deficits?
That somehow the crackpot economic theory MMT (Magic Money Tree) has become conventional wisdom?
How is this possible?
Simple expedient short term thinking by career Politicians? (If so, then Term Limits!)
Since Academics dominate the Federal Reserve system, is this a function of a deluded Left Wing Academia cranking out thousands of PhDs in Economics, that tolerates no diversity of “thought”? (If so, then Defund Academia !)

But why don’t the younger generations resist? They are the ones to face the bill.
Even if the bill comes in the form of INFLATION

The Daily Zeitgeist

You Can’t Handle The Lie

By Rusty Guinn | November 6, 2020 | 35 Comments

Any news outlet that won’t let you see a lie does not work for you.

Read more

How It Started. How It’s Going.

By Ben Hunt | October 20, 2020 | 10 Comments

Once Daryl Morey’s new idea became the common knowledge of the NBA – once everyone knows that everyone knows that the way to win NBA games is to maximize 3-point shots and lay-ups – then it became a permanent feature of the way professional basketball is played. It became an equilibrium.

It’s exactly the same with politics.

Read more

The Frustrated Money Manager

By Ben Hunt | October 8, 2020 | 12 Comments

The frustrated money manager is almost always a smart, accomplished professional in his own field who believes VERY much in the existence of The Smart Money ™.

The frustrated money manager is almost always a liiiittttle bit on the make.

Like a Vatican cardinal.

Read more

Scapegoating the Zeitgeist

By Ben Hunt | October 2, 2020 | 5 Comments

One day we will recognize the defining Zeitgeist of the post-GFC Obama/Trump years for what it is: an unparalleled transfer of wealth to the managerial class.

This Wall Street Journal article is not an attack on that system. It is a defense. It is telling you that the system is fine … we just need to do something about these bad apple CEOs.

Read more

Why Am I Reading This Now?

By Ben Hunt | September 25, 2020 | 8 Comments

Yesterday, 5 GOP Senators wrote a letter to Netflix, saying that their plan to adapt Liu Cixin’s “The Three Body Problem” for TV/film amounted to “complicity” with the CCP and their horrific mistreatment of the Uyghurs.

Why am I reading this NOW?

Read more

The UNITED States of America

By Ben Hunt | September 19, 2020 | 7 Comments

My RBG story …

I thought she’d be all about women’s rights and legal theory this and legal theory that. I was SO wrong.

RBG’s death is an enormous loss for the UNITED States of America.

Read more

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.