The Zeitgeist – 5.3.2019

2+

Every morning, we run the Narrative Machine on the past 24 hours worth of financial media to find the most on-narrative (i.e. interconnected and central) stories in financial media. It’s not a list of best articles or articles we think are most interesting … often far from it.

But for whatever reason these are articles that are representative of some sort of chord that has been struck in Narrative-world.


May 3, 2019 Narrative Map – US Equities

Source: Quid, Epsilon Theory

Fed Reverberations: Market Starts Coming To Terms With Lower Rate Cut Hopes [Forbes]


If actual volatility is the only thing that can save us from these melodramatic analogies from people who clearly have never had children who expect a snack, I’m ready.


Ask These 10 Questions Before Investing In A Company [Forbes]

I know we give the Forbes Contributors a hard time, but it’s also important to point out those times when an article ISN’T a weird advertisement to an unknown audience wrapped in a milquetoast listicle. I mean, to be clear, this isn’t one of those times, but I want to make sure you know we agree that it would be important to point out if it were.

The most universal observation about these pieces – and frankly a lot of other white-paper-lite style content and one-off corporate blogs – is that they never seem to have the foggiest idea who their audience is. Who out there is looking for ten pieces of advice on investing in a non-public company who need to get this as the culminating pearl:


Powell’s Gut Punch to Equities May Be a Belly Rub: Taking Stock [Bloomberg]

You could go with this, or you could go with that.


Asset Managers Are More Pessimistic Than Ever on the Swiss Franc [Bloomberg]

Ordinarily I think that survey levels of “asset manager” positioning are cartoons, representations of survey methodology and underlying universe biases more than anything. That may be (and probably is) the case here to some extent, but at least anecdotally, I’m aware of at least a few macro funds with this positioning.

Leaving aside whether the article is true or whether it matters, why did it rise to the top of the Zeitgeist like this?

Here’s why:

  • It connects European currency and fixed income discussions to a growing number of articles about EM Local yield-hogging, like this one.
  • It is also connected to articles referencing “extremes” in flows and investor behavior w/r/t fixed income and currencies across other markets, including articles like this one about US corporates.
  • It uses similar language to other “safety” asset stories referencing polls and surveys (i.e. similarities in both topical language and affected usage), like this one.

SocGen’s stronger showing on capital offsets profit fall [Reuters]

Image result for snl change bank

Paul McElroy: A lot of people don’t realize that change is a two-way street. You can come in with sixteen quarters, eight dimes, and four nickels – we can give you a five-dollar bill. Or we can give you five singles. Or two singles, eight quarters, and ten dimes. You’d be amazed at the variety of the options you have…

All the time, our customers ask us, “How do you make money doing this?” The answer is simple: Volume. That’s what we do.

– First Citiwide Change Bank, Saturday Night Live (10.8.1988)


150 years ago, 12 men in Cincinnati took a chance on baseball and changed the world [USA Today]

At the very least, they changed the US, Latin America and East Asia. Although, as always, there are efforts to export and import American-born sports to new markets. The NFL has tried aggressively with the UK, for example, and the NBA has been quite successful in exporting basketball to China. But MLB has been less aggressive, and (oddly, in my judgment) less visibly interested in developing a more global audience for our one-time national pastime.

Leave it to a fan in the UK to take that burden on himself. If you haven’t been following Joey Mellows’s tour of major and minor league stadiums across the United States, I highly recommend you do so – @BaseballBrit on Twitter.


Beyond Meat opens at $46 in market debut, after pricing at $25 per share [CNBC]

So much of narrative abstraction – especially of growth narratives – is the simple act of declaration – I declare that this thing is actually THIS.

I declare that Salesforce.com is not just a UI slapped on a basic database, but a disruption in the very way America does business! How? Oh, I could give you an answer, but the only ones who’d understand it would be you and me. And that includes your teacher.

I declare that WeWork is not in the business of renting office space, but the pure and disruptive distillation of the essence of the spirit of community, now available in a convenient securitized format for your convenience.

I declare that Tesla is NOT REALLY a car company, but a…I don’t know, are we still doing the Tesla thing, guys? Guys?

It’s the same thing with Beyond Meat, which I declare is absolutely NOT in the business of selling processed, pre-packaged food products.

In a Three-Body Market, knowing what something really is is still important. Knowing that what it really is isn’t the only thing that matters is even more important.

2+

To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You'll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever. It's our effort to spread the word about what we're doing, and allow you to read more Epsilon Theory!

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
Notify of

The Daily Zeitgeist

Narrative is not a Disease. Narrative is Us.

By Ben Hunt | September 16, 2019 | 3 Comments

Robert Shiller’s new book, “Narrative Economics”, will be out soon, and the publicity effort is kicking into gear. I am SO HAPPY that the rigorous study of narratives is finally being taken seriously, and grateful to Shiller for making that happen.

I am also SO DEPRESSED about how Shiller’s central metaphor, that narrative = infectious disease, will be used against us. Because the “cure” is the Nudge.

Read more

Sparks, Arcs and Trademarks

By Rusty Guinn | September 13, 2019 | 0 Comments

I’m not sure if electric buses are really a national security risk. Even if they are, I’m not sure characterizing them that way is really an escalation of the trade war into existential rhetoric land.

But it’s worth watching.

Read more

When Meta-Analysis Goes Meta

By Rusty Guinn | September 9, 2019 | 4 Comments

What does it mean when it becomes common knowledge that other investors are focused on evaluating common knowledge?

Read more

I’ve Got a Secret

By Ben Hunt | September 6, 2019 | 8 Comments

Is there a bubble in passive investing? Honestly, I’m not even sure what that question is asking.

I DO think there’s a bubble in markets today – a behavioral bubble I’ll call ABB.

Always. Be. Buying.

And the Common Knowledge around passive investing is what blows this bubble. That’s MY secret.

Read more

The Industrially Necessary Egg

By Ben Hunt | September 5, 2019 | 1 Comment

In modern farming and in modern investing, we have become prisoners of the monoculture. It’s efficient. It’s necessary for a mass society of ever-increasing Desire.

But here’s the thing …

In the investment monoculture, you’re not the farmer.

Read more

Gell-Mann Gravity

By Rusty Guinn | September 3, 2019 | 0 Comments

It’s the Monday Zeitgeist, including all known lanthanides and actinides.

Read more

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.