The Zeitgeist – 3.7.2019


Every morning, we run the Narrative Machine on the past 24 hours worth of financial media to find the most on-narrative (i.e. interconnected and central) stories in financial media. It’s not a list of best articles or articles we think are most interesting … often far from it.

But for whatever reason these are articles that are representative of some sort of chord that has been struck in Narrative-world.

I’m channeling my inner MST3K with the comments here. Premium subscribers should feel free to join me in the Comments section (but only if you know what MST3K is!), and I’ll reprint the best ones in an upcoming Mailbag note.

Billions Are Headed to One Market. You Can Get There First []

Four or five times a week, I’ll get an email from someone asking if they can place an “article” on Epsilon Theory. Sometimes it’s about something vaguely finance related, sometimes it’s not (a buying guide to survival knives is still my personal fave of proposed topics). Back in the day, almost all of these emails “offered” these articles as free for me to publish, because obviously they were doing me a favor by giving me “content” to put on the website. As ET has grown in reputation (?) or maybe just because we’ve been around long enough, I don’t get many emails offering free content anymore, but just directly asking for my rate to publish sponsored content. Not ads, mind you, which I’m happy to quote you a rate for, but for “articles” on such and such topic written by one of their clients.

My response is always the same. If Ken Fisher would rather die and go to hell than sell you an annuity, I’d rather die and go to hell than publish a bullshit “article” that someone paid me to flog. It’s not just a personal preference. It’s a smarter business model.

Every self-professed “financial media” website I read today publishes sponsored content masquerading as legit content. As a result, they have all become platforms for raccoons. All of them, including the biggest brand names in our business … Bloomberg, Forbes, Nasdaq, CNBC, you name it. ALL OF THEM now have websites that are infested by raccoons. It’s the most penny-wise and pound-foolish thing they could possibly do, but god knows we live in a profoundly penny-wise and pound-foolish world. It destroys their credibility and authenticity, which destroys the quality and engagement of their online readership, which destroys their CPM rates … it’s all a vicious cycle which is killing has killed the business model of these media sites.

So thank you, Forbes. Thank you, Bloomberg. Thank you, Nasdaq. Thank you, CNBC. Thanks for destroying your online media businesses and donating your audience to us. We really couldn’t do it without you.

Deputy SNP leader says new Scottish independence vote could happen without UK blessing []

California has wrestled with what I’ll call “the referendum problem” for decades. The UK, of course, has been knocked politically flat by this, as has Spain. And it’s coming to the US, too, in the form of “electoral college reform” to make our one national vote “more democratic”. It’s part of the widening gyre. It’s part of the shift in the Zeitgeist. Everyone can gnash their teeth and wring their hands if you like, but it won’t stop this.

What, you’re opposed to democracy?

US Govt not willing to go on ‘international fishing expedition’ for evidence in spoofing case [FinanceFeeds]

If I were a betting man (and I am), I’d be willing to place a large wager that the judge here will deny the defendant’s discovery request for information collected by US and UK market regulatory bodies. It’s all part and parcel of the phenomenal growth in the surveillance capabilities of market regulators, combined with the presumption of guilt if you outperform a market.

And of course I think Sarao and Thakkar are outright raccoons who deserve to have the book thrown at them. But when it comes to the Surveillance State, everyone who says “if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to worry about” is either a fool or a stooge. Probably both.

Amid Volatility, Advisers Report Ongoing Client Equity Focus [planadviser]

Another version of sponsored content here, but that’s not my point. I think what investors are going to “wake up to” over the next few years is the portfolio PENALTY from fixed income investing.

Howard Marks: The Paradox of Risk []

I’ll start by making the required genuflection to Howard Marks as a great investor. Yes, so stipulated. Seriously.

But there is zero functional or linguistic difference between a religious seminary and these sites that recite and interpret the Value Canon, and it drives me nuts.

Risk defined as volatility is the worst definition of risk … except for all the others. Defining risk as potential for (permanent) loss is a meaningless tautology, useful only to the Faithful.

The Market Gapitalization [Phil’s Stockworld]

This article is by Michael Batnick, riffing on an exhibit in the Credit Suisse global investment yearbook. It’s a good example of what makes Batnick a long-time Epsilon Theory fave, because he gets right at the heart of what’s interesting in the long-term DM vs. EM chart – World War II.

Everything you think you know about investing – EVERYTHING – is because the United States won World War II.

I don’t think we’re going to have another World War. I really don’t. But a change in the Zeitgeist can have the same functional impact as a World War. And I really DO think that’s happening.


To receive a free full-text email of The Zeitgeist whenever we publish to the website, please sign up here. You'll get two or three of these emails every week, and your email will not be shared with anyone. Ever. It's our effort to spread the word about what we're doing, and allow you to read more Epsilon Theory!

Notify of
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Interesting how Buffett just so-happened to NAIL the post-WWII zeitgeist.

The Daily Zeitgeist

We are all MMTers (Still)

By Rusty Guinn | October 22, 2020 | 5 Comments

Stimulus is dominating market news, and even with an election coming up is playing an outsized role in political news. So what is the current fiscal stimulus really about?

Maybe more importantly, what is it absolutely, definitely NOT about?

Read more

How It Started. How It’s Going.

By Ben Hunt | October 20, 2020 | 6 Comments

Once Daryl Morey’s new idea became the common knowledge of the NBA – once everyone knows that everyone knows that the way to win NBA games is to maximize 3-point shots and lay-ups – then it became a permanent feature of the way professional basketball is played. It became an equilibrium.

It’s exactly the same with politics.

Read more

The Frustrated Money Manager

By Ben Hunt | October 8, 2020 | 12 Comments

The frustrated money manager is almost always a smart, accomplished professional in his own field who believes VERY much in the existence of The Smart Money ™.

The frustrated money manager is almost always a liiiittttle bit on the make.

Like a Vatican cardinal.

Read more

Scapegoating the Zeitgeist

By Ben Hunt | October 2, 2020 | 4 Comments

One day we will recognize the defining Zeitgeist of the post-GFC Obama/Trump years for what it is: an unparalleled transfer of wealth to the managerial class.

This Wall Street Journal article is not an attack on that system. It is a defense. It is telling you that the system is fine … we just need to do something about these bad apple CEOs.

Read more

Why Am I Reading This Now?

By Ben Hunt | September 25, 2020 | 8 Comments

Yesterday, 5 GOP Senators wrote a letter to Netflix, saying that their plan to adapt Liu Cixin’s “The Three Body Problem” for TV/film amounted to “complicity” with the CCP and their horrific mistreatment of the Uyghurs.

Why am I reading this NOW?

Read more

The UNITED States of America

By Ben Hunt | September 19, 2020 | 7 Comments

My RBG story …

I thought she’d be all about women’s rights and legal theory this and legal theory that. I was SO wrong.

RBG’s death is an enormous loss for the UNITED States of America.

Read more


This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.