Riding the Cyclone

16+

Every morning, we run the Narrative Machine on the past 24 hours worth of financial media to find the most on-narrative (i.e. interconnected and central) stories in financial media. It’s not a list of best articles or articles we think are most interesting … often far from it.

But for whatever reason these are articles that are representative of some sort of chord that has been struck in Narrative-world.


A $1,800 Drop in Minutes: Bitcoin Volatility on Full Display    [Yahoo Finance]

Bitcoin soared as much as 39% this week to $13,852, the highest since January 2018. But it hit a brick wall around 4:30 p.m. New York time Wednesday, plunging more than $1,800 within about 10 minutes. Moments later, prominent cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Inc. reported an outage on its consumer site, which was resolved in under an hour.

Swings continued Thursday, with the coin anywhere from down 15% to up 4.8%. It was down 15% to $11,111 as of 12:23 p.m. in New York. Volatility in Bitcoin is near the highest levels since early 2018, when the bubble was bursting.

Analysts said this was likely a sign of things to come.

Sorry, just couldn’t help myself when I grabbed this photo of the Cyclone rollercoaster. Had to isolate these two gents, not to diss but out of respect. This is authentic joy, in a world where that can be mighty hard to come by.

Hey, I’m Big Lou … I’m just like you. Except rollercoasters make me too dizzy to ride these days.

The rollercoaster nature of Bitcoin is a feature, not a bug.

It is not to be wished away or adulterated. It is to be celebrated. It is an integral and authentically joyful part of the experiential or performance art that IS Bitcoin.

People always think I’m trolling or dissing when I call bitcoin a work of art, but they couldn’t be more wrong. It is my highest praise. The creation of good art is – in my opinion – what we are put on this earth to do. It is our highest calling.

I’m totally serious about that, btw.

There is lasting value in good art, because it is a very scarce thing and it never gets used up. The notion that Bitcoin would ever “go to zero” is ludicrous. Good art is always worth something.

But how do we measure that something … how do we put a price on the value of good art at this particular moment in time? It’s a REALLY tough question.

Why? Because we don’t have a toolkit for it.

We have plenty of toolkits for measuring cash flows, both current and prospective. We have plenty of toolkits for measuring the “fundamentals” of this thing or that thing that we want to buy or sell. We can argue about whether the price we ask for this collection of fundamental metrics is too high, or whether the price we bid for this collection of fundamental metrics is too low, but there IS a shared conception – a common knowledge – for the process of pricing the value of “fundamentals”.

But there are no cash flows to art. There are no fundamentals to art. There is no common knowledge – what everyone knows that everyone knows – on valuation metrics for art.

There is only story. There is only narrative. There is only how story and narrative make us FEEL.

Again, I don’t say this as a put-down. I say this in awe.

The price of Bitcoin, like the price of any great work of experiential or performance art, is entirely based on narratives.

The price of Bitcoin is entirely based on how these narratives make us FEEL.

Gold, too.

Over the past few months, we’ve developed a new toolkit for measuring stories and narratives, for moving beyond conditioning attributes like sentiment and identifying structural attributes like attention and cohesion.

It’s a major advance in what we call the Narrative Machine.

We first wrote about this new toolkit here, with an application to stock market sectors:

And most recently here, with the results of our test of that application:

We’re now ready to turn this toolkit on Bitcoin and gold, to see what the Narrative Machine can tell us about the price of both.


16+

The Daily Zeitgeist

The Only Winning Move

By Rusty Guinn | July 19, 2019 | 1 Comment

It’s privacy and big tech again in today’s Zeitgeist, which is all about mutually assured surveillance. And for Epsilon Theory, it hits home. I think it will hit home for you, too.

Read more

We’re Gonna Need a Bigger Boat

By Ben Hunt | July 15, 2019 | 0 Comments

Financialization is not a mean-reverting phenomenon. It’s too good of a gravy train for Wall Street, corporate management and the White House to stop now. So they won’t. Like any self-respecting Great White shark, the Nudging State and the Nudging Oligarchy never stop swimming. They never stop eating.

Want to survive these financialized waters if you’re potential shark food? You’re gonna need a bigger boat.

Read more

When Did You Stop Beating Your Wife?

By Ben Hunt | July 12, 2019 | 1 Comment

“De Blasio’s ‘pay parity’ hypocrisy” is a feature article in today’s NY Post, and a central article in today’s media Zeitgeist.

Dig a little deeper into the “scandal”, and you learn that the “evidence” is complete horseshit.

It’s an article specifically designed to manipulate someone like me … someone who is VERY predisposed to believe the worst about Bill de Blasio because I dislike his politics SO MUCH.

It’s a rage engagement, one of two primary forms of Fiat News used to win the Game of You.

Read more

The Upside Down

By Ben Hunt | July 9, 2019 | 1 Comment

Everything is topsy-turvy in the Upside Down of Stranger Things. That’s the Big Baddie in the picture above, known as the Mind Flayer.

Financial media is a Mind Flayer, too, especially when it comes to coverage of crypto and tech companies.

Read more

Raking it in

By Rusty Guinn | July 8, 2019 | 0 Comments

A few months ago, we noted how important it had become for public figures and corporations to control their own cartoon, lest someone control it for them. Well, now that advice has itself become the narrative. Don’t say you weren’t warned.

Read more

Here We Go Again

By Ben Hunt | July 2, 2019 | 1 Comment

“You just recently hours ago met with the Chinese president, Xi Jinping,” Carlson said. “Are you closer, do you think after that meeting, to a trade deal?”

“I think so,” Trump replied. “We had a very good meeting. He wants to make a deal. I want to make a deal. Very big deal, probably, I guess you’d say the largest deal ever made of any kind, not only trade.”

He just can’t help himself. And neither can we.

Read more

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Christopher Beirn
Member
Christopher Beirn

Summer plans:

Buy Bitcoin

Tug on Superman’s cape

Spit into wind

Winter plans:

Invade Russia

Bring knife to gunfight

Piss on third rail

Double-down on Bitcoin

2+
Rafa Mayer
Member
Rafa Mayer

Ben, Ben, Ben…

You are hanging out on the wrong side of the art world. The viewers of art have no idea how to value art. The artists, art dealers and auction houses are all well steeped in the fundamentals of supply and demand, scarcity value and how to maximize the amount paid at auction through one of the most impressive behavioral bag of tricks known to humankind. They know exactly how to raise the value of art through emotional trickery.

(As an aside, I once had an opportunity to meet Jack Binyan, casino billionaire. He explained to me his business as the manufacture of an emotional experience for the bettor that was designed to encourage sloppy gambling that favored the House. Jack doesn’t drink. When I once asked him why, he smiled impishly and said “casino rules: liquor is only for the customers”.)

The buying and selling of art, to me, is one of the greatest con jobs of our time! The art “investor” is truly the patsy at the table in this game.

3+
DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.