Lucifer’s Hammer

71+

Epsilon Theory PDF Download (paid subscribers only): Lucifer’s Hammer


The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum.


The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.


Ethics change with technology.


Quotes by legendary science fiction author Larry Niven, none of which are from Lucifer’s Hammer.


I was 14 years old when I read Lucifer’s Hammer, the post-apocalyptic novel by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle about a comet hitting the Earth. It’s pretty standard end-of-the-world fare, with mile-high tsunamis and volcanos emerging from earthquakes and billions dead and an intrepid community of surviving scientists/libertarians defeating the cannibal, faux-religious, statist army-remaindered horde that attacks without warning or honor.

It was one of those books that I read at just the right time, so I remember entire passages almost verbatim.

I remember how the odds of the comet hitting the Earth were minuscule at first, but every day would go up ever so slightly. I remember how smart people paid attention to that … to a 1/100th of 1% chance moving to a 1/10th of 1% chance moving to a 1% chance, when the probabilities are converging on the same event.

I remember how the sentry’s signal to the sniper that all was well was to raise his arms as if he were being held hostage, because of course that’s the action that any would-be bad guy would forbid the sentry to take under any circumstances.

I remember how the battle with the cannibal, faux-religious, statist army-remaindered horde is ultimately won by getting them into a valley and them lobbing homebrew mustard gas canisters at them, and how the lung-destroyed survivors are dispatched by crossbow bolts so as not to waste any bullets.

I remember how the scientist hero saves the future of humanity by wrapping a full set of Encyclopedia Britannica and The Way Things Work in double-sealed plastic bags with mothballs, and then hiding them in a septic tank.

But most of all, I remember the voice of Ego whispering this in my ear:


“You know, this whole post-apocalyptic thing doesn’t sound half bad!”

Sure, I’d have to survive that initial strike. And sure, it’s all quite sad that people I love (i.e., my parents) would have to die. But tbh, they had a good run, and I’m sure it would be a painless death. And this post-apocalyptic society … why, it’s a meritocracy, where my hidden genius and quiet courage and (very) untapped virility would finally be appreciated!


Those whispers of Ego, those post-apocalyptic fantasies of a 14-year-old boy, have never left me.

I’m 56 years old, and I still fantasize about how I could take out a motorcycle gang assaulting the farm. I’ve figured out where to set up the enfilade line of fire, where to plant the IED and how big it would need to be to take out a half-track armored vehicle. I’ve spent many a pleasant hour figuring out how to construct a laser-guided RPG for when, you know, the cannibal, faux-religious, statist army-remaindered horde sends their helicopter out in support of the (now dead) motorcycle advance troops and half-track APC.

If I were a betting man – and I am – I would place a large wager that every first-world post-pubescent reader of this note similarly burdened with a y-chromosome harbors similar fantasies. Not just Harry Potter/Disney/comic book oh-I’m-a-special-orphan-destined-to-lead-a-grand-struggle fantasies, but “real” post-apocalyptic how-do-I-kill-the-motorcycle-gang fantasies.


NARRATOR:

The world after the comet hits is not a meritocracy, but a brutal dictatorship without end, where boys like you are used as fodder and feed. And girls like your daughters are used as worse.

Death is pain incarnate, always and without exception. And yet there are worse pains that await you after the comet hits.

This is not a fucking game.


It has taken me a lifetime to hear the Narrator more loudly than the Ego.


It has taken me a lifetime to see clearly not only what deserves burning down but how to burn it down.

The What is the inequitable social structures of power in our normal, quotidian lives, both in the halls of secular mightiness and – even more so – in our own freakin’ hearts.

The How is the unrelenting willingness to Make, to Protect and to Teach away from and in resistance to those inequitable social structures of power, creating a social movement that ignores the institutionally nudged and amplified whispers of Ego, that turns the other cheek as it builds and builds and builds and builds a new nation of … believers. Believers in the white-hot power of making, protecting and teaching to burn away the accumulated crud of decades of I-got-mine-jack sociopathy. Believers in the flamethrower of change that is political participation through community action, not just the sparkler of change that is political participation through voting once every four years.

Turning the other cheek doesn’t mean you don’t get angry. Trust me, I am SO angry! That’s why I use angry words, like BITFD – Burn. It. The. Fuck. Down. – words intended to galvanize and shock, yes, and also words that embody the cold rage that first engulfed me during the Great Financial Crisis and has grown and grown with every moment of the Long Now. But anger is not enough. In the history of social change, mere anger has never been enough.

Turning the other cheek – which is just the OG phrase for nonviolent protest – is a strategy for channeling our anger and weaponizing our voice.

It’s a choice.

It’s choosing the clear eyes needed to recognize that the institutions and the high-functioning sociopaths who wield today’s inequitable social structures of power WANT you to strike back with your fists rather than your words. It’s choosing the full heart needed to take a hit for the Pack through nonviolent protests, sure, but nonviolent actions even more – unwavering, constant nonviolent actions of exit, sacrifice, voice and mutual support from the bottom-up – creating a decentralized epistemic Fight Club of citizens who make their way IN this fallen world without being OF this fallen world.

It’s the smart play.

As wise as serpents. As harmless as doves.

2,000 years ago, this was pretty good advice for changing the world when the wolves of powerful, entrenched interests were looking for any excuse to rip your throat out, and it’s pretty good advice today.

And yes, this is how we change the world. This is how we BITFD. For real. For good.

Unfortunately, we believers have a problem. That problem is that no one gives a damn about burning down the systems of control and nudge when their actual house and their actual car are actually burning.

But that’s the comet that’s speeding our way, a comet of endemic urban violence.

And for so many people – especially young men with the voice of Ego now shouting in their heads as the whispers are turned up to 11 by the amps of party and media – they think that sounds just dandy.

This has all happened before.

Back in the day, when I was a young pup of a poli sci professor at NYU, actual Marxists roamed the Earth. In my experience, Marxists are infallibly delightful conversationalists, and at an academic dinner I got to talking with two of these ancient dinosaurs (one of whom remains an avowed Marxist to this day and the other who had forsworn his faith) about the 1968 riots in Paris. They had both been there, manning the barricades! The Mother of All Protests! A national uprising against the police powers of a far rightwing President hellbent on reshaping the French republic!

I asked them to describe their experience. What was it like to be a part of May 1968, a student-led protest that mobilized the working class and shut down the entire country of France? That forced de Gaulle to (briefly) flee the country?

The old Marxist looked at his friend, the now disavowed Marxist.


“Well, I remember I got laid a lot.”

“Yes,” said his friend with a wink, “it was quite a lot of fun.”


And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen, the dirty little secret of every riot and protest and looting that ever existed in the history of mankind … IT’S FUN.

And not to be outdone, here’s the dirty little secret of every counterprotest and posse and vigilante group and “militia” that ever existed in the history of mankind … IT’S FUN.

I felt weightless. I felt that nothing would happen to me. I felt that anything might happen to me. I was looking straight ahead, running, trying to keep up, and things were occurring along the dark peripheries of my vision: there would be a bright light and then darkness again and the sound, constantly, of something else breaking, and of movement, of objects being thrown and of people falling.

I had not expected the violence to be so pleasurable.

That’s Bill Buford, literary editor and SJW, who started off writing an anthropological study of Man United “hooligans”, only to be embraced as part of the crew and to discover the atavistic joys of a good rumble.

Among the Thugs is the best book you’ll ever read about the human nature of riots and group violence.

Know who’s having fun tonight? Know who’s running on adrenaline and endorphins and the rush of cops and robbers? Know who simultaneously believes that nothing can happen to them and that everything could happen to them? All of the BLM “organizers” and all of the Antifa “cadres” and all of the Proud/Boogaloo “boys” and all of the MAGA militia “soldiers”, that’s who.

Man, they’re all having a blast.

All with the voice of Ego running through their minds, all secure in the knowledge that they matter and will be recognized for their meritorious service to this mighty cause.

How do we stop the violence and the carnage of these bullshit and criminal “fiery but mostly peaceful” night time waves of destruction, and – increasingly – the bullshit and criminal confrontations between rival English soccer team political supporters?

How do we stop burning down the wrong things so we can get started on burning down the right things?

We change the narrative that these burners and looters and counter-burners and counter-looters tell themselves. We make it not fun, for the burners and looters as well as for the counter-burners and counter-looters.

We change the narrative by removing the oppositional foil of the rioting and looting story arc – we make it impossible to believe that the criminals are part of an unrequited struggle against The Man and his inexorable injustice – so that all that is left is the petty (and not so petty) criminal behavior which cannot be excused. We accomplish this with accommodation. Not by agreeing to “demands” … usually there are no demands by daylight nonviolent protesters … but by elected leaders resigning and/or establishing new elections/plebiscites so that there is a clear and meaningful alternative outlet for nonviolent protesters’ voices.

Portland mayor Ted Wheeler, who refuses to defund the police in the way that Portland protesters mean the word (i.e. abolish), should resign. AND he should run in the special election called to replace him. AND the Portland protesters should put up their own candidate who will, in fact, defund the police to oblivion. Then vote. Let’s do this next week. Let’s see who the people of Portland put into office. Either the dog catches the car or the car runs over the dog. Either way, the story arc of this particular protest narrative ends there.

We make it not fun by removing the thrill of the chase and the thrill of the fight – we contain the rioters and the night time looters – so that all that is left is the boredom of walking around and yelling into the wind all night. We accomplish this with numbers and curfews. We request the assistance of the National Guard – of course we request the assistance of the National Guard! – so that we have the sheer numbers of trained personnel to contain the bullshit looters and keep out the bullshit “militias”.

That’s how we work our way through this.

We accommodate protester voice through new elections/plebiscites, and we contain criminal tag-alongs with sheer numbers of trained public safety officers.

Together, these actions change the story that we tell each other about the crimes that are committed in the name of a just struggle, AND these actions change the story that the wannabe and the confirmed criminals are able to tell themselves.

That’s exactly how the May 1968 riots in France were defused.

De Gaulle, under pressure from his #2, Georges Pompidou, finally accommodated demands for government change by agreeing to new elections. At the same time, the Parisian police, backed by the French military, contained the protesting students by avoiding pitched conflict and preventing the takeover of government buildings.

But that’s not going to happen in 2020 America. In fact, the opposite of this is going to happen. Why?

Because it’s not just the Antifa/MAGA Militia goonies who are positively giddy with excitement at the prospects of this post-apocalyptic world. It’s not just these clowns and criminals and wannabe culture war heroes. It’s also every media organization that covers the night time “protests”. It’s also the Republican party AND the Democratic party, both their elected officials AND their party apparatchiks, who are intentionally amplifying the Ego whispers to their proxies through their MSM and social media platforms for a perceived electoral advantage.

It’s not the Russians or the Chinese doing this to us.

We’re doing this to ourselves.

Four years ago, when I wrote that I thought Trump would defeat Clinton, I said that Trump breaks us by turning every one of our domestic political games from a coordination game – where cooperation in the national interest is at least possible – into a pure competition game where that potential cooperation is impossible. He did. That’s exactly what happened.

So today, neither the Trump campaign nor the Biden campaign can see the United States through anything other than the lens of a pure competition game.

Neither campaign or party will take the necessary steps to defuse the growing violence in American cities, like Biden calling for Democratic mayors to request National Guard support or like Trump doing anything to accommodate the voices of nonviolent protesters, because they both think that to do so would place them at a competitive disadvantage in the November election.

Neither campaign or party is appropriately afraid of this comet hitting the United States, because they both think that they’ll do just fine in a post-comet world. They both think that they can handle the aftermath of this comet strike after November 4th. They both are listening to their institutional Ego rather than to the Narrator.

They are both sowing the wind.

And they will both reap the whirlwind.

Neither the Democratic party nor the Republican party survives a defeat this November in anything close to their current form. I think several people are starting to think about that.

But here’s what’s also true:

Neither the Democratic party nor the Republican party survives a victory this November.

And no one is thinking about that.


Oh, and a quick post script. In case you were wondering about that snap election that de Gaulle called in May 1968, the election that the Socialists expected to win in a walk given the initial popularity of the student protests and the early ham-handed reactions by de Gaulle and his “Law and Order” / “France First” party … it was, in fact, a landslide.

For de Gaulle.


Epsilon Theory PDF Download (paid subscribers only): Lucifer’s Hammer


71+
Notify of
40 Comments
oldest
newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lawrence Pusateri
3 months ago

A great read Ben , Over the weekend I had my “Tokyo Marathon” moment. For weeks I have wondered , what the hell is the endgame here. I watch the cities burn and word violence redefined to not include destruction of property , the entire media sings out of the EXACT same hymn book that what we are all watching is nonviolent it has been surreal. It was this weekend listening Lebron James talking about the NBA’s protest of cancelled games for “Social Justice” that caught my attention —-I was finally going to hear what the protesters wanted….other than defunding the police. He wanted the league to perform a voting drive and use its arenas as voting places , I presume to defeat Donald Trump—it hit me like a ton of bricks. All this coordination by the media the renfields of the party and the party itself , and the mayors of all these cities who have done nothing but cheerlead as their own cities burn—this is all about defeating Donald Trump in November. That’s it – nothing more nothing less. Why am I seeing this now? Police shootings have remained constant, the numbers by race have also been the same for a decade at least. The National media is devoting the lions share to these stories now because they are building a narrative that this is Donald Trumps America where “ The State” kills black people simply because they are black. The facts that none of these cops involved… Read more »

Allen Olinger
2 months ago

Very good points and well written. I just returned to MT from San Franciso. Spent 3 nights at the Mark Hopkins, the only main hotel open in the city. I was born there. It was an elegant, vibrant place. Today downtown is literally a shithole. In a 3/4 mile walk up Van Ness to CA street and back to the hotel I saw 3 piles of human feces. Bums came out of doorways like Zombies. Post Street, the main shopping street is about 1/4 boarded up to protect against rioters. About 1/3 of the stores are vacant. No one on the streets. Sure COVID is a big part but who would want to go there even after the disease blows over. I understand property values in the city are going down as they go up in the suburbs. Why would anyone commute to the city when none your clients are there. And why go there when zombie bums roam the streets and there are no police to protect you? Yes it will get better eventually but I doubt it will get great in the way it was. Basic civility is gone. I don’t see it matters who wins in Nov.

Lawrence Pusateri
2 months ago
Reply to  Allen Olinger

I was in San Francisco in the mid 1980’s and I was a very cool city. It is sad what it has become.

Vince
3 months ago

I’m worried we get our own version of The Troubles either way.

zenzei
3 months ago

Proverbs 11:29 He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind…

Them that seeks division and war should spend some time watching Band of Brothers.

Eric
3 months ago

Was intending to write a big long response to this that even included an excerpt from a poem — but, upon reflection, I am deeply conflicted and confused by our current moment, as I suspect many people are if they don’t have the armor of rigid ideology, so I’ve decided to note one thing only:

I am so happy you used a specific historical analogy to make a point that was not the “US-as-Weimar” or “US-as-Roman Republic” — tropes that irritates me to an extreme degree.

Rusty Guinn
3 months ago
Reply to  Ben Hunt

Plus I’d already made the Huey Long comp, so you’re running out of Trumplikes.

Eric
3 months ago
Reply to  Rusty Guinn

Personally, I am not afraid that anyone will, at any time, run out of comparisons – no matter how tenuous.

My current favorite is Louis XV: “a Donothing and Eatall” – whether or not the analogy truly holds in any way…

Looking forward to the ET piece focusing on analogies of the early Tsars of Russia: “Ivan the Terrible – the Trump of his times? An Investigation into Passive Index Flows and Narrative Construction.”

That is enough silliness from me, but in a serious way, the more narrow and precise the historical analogy is, I think the better.

Mark22
3 months ago

This:

==> “Portland mayor Ted Wheeler, who refuses to defund the police in the way that Portland protesters mean the word (i.e. abolish), should resign. AND he should run in the special election called to replace him. AND the Portland protesters should put up their own candidate who will, in fact, defund the police to oblivion. Then vote. Let’s do this next week. Let’s see who the people of Portland put into office. Either the dog catches the car or the car runs over the dog. Either way, the story arc of this particular protest narrative ends there.

We make it not fun by removing the thrill of the chase and the thrill of the fight – we contain the rioters and the night time looters – so that all that is left is the boredom of walking around and yelling into the wind all night. We accomplish this with numbers and curfews. We request the assistance of the National Guard – of course we request the assistance of the National Guard! – so that we have the sheer numbers of trained personnel to contain the bullshit looters and keep out the bullshit “militias”.
That’s how we work our way through this.

We accommodate protester voice through new elections/plebiscites, and we contain criminal tag-alongs with sheer numbers of trained public safety officers.” <==

Enough, let’s see if people really want to fully defund the police. Let’s see how popular zero police protection is as policy?

What I’ve seen all along is that almost everyone agrees with the non-violent protests against the specific police actions we’ve witnessed on TV and the idea of police targeting blacks. Away from some fringe crazies, I haven’t heard any public official say otherwise – or anyone in my all-over-the-policial-map friends and relatives – not one.

So great, we all agree that bad is bad. What I haven’t seen is, until “defund the police” took off, any specific policy response ideas. It’s been protest as identity and virtue signaling that spiraled into violence and, yes, death and destruction. And for that, sorry, you can hate me and think I’m a T supporter (I’m not), I blame mainly the left. But now everyone’s getting in on the fun – sigh.

But still, what is the policy people want? Let’s have the first vote Ben suggests (and have it everywhere) – defund or not? Then, maybe, we can have more votes till we get to a reasonable response. I have my ideas, but they’re not important; what is important is that we find an answer within the system we have.

I’m not sure I fully understand the process of Ben’s BITFD, but I kinda think he says we make the political parties irrelevant by not playing their game. So let’s not play their game of violence-in-the-street to get them votes; let force real votes on real issues to get answers.

Mark22
3 months ago
Reply to  Mark22

Side note, didn’t there use to be an edit button for these comment that allowed – for several minutes anyway – one to edit their comments? My above comment doesn’t make it clear where Ben’s quote stops (after “public safety officers” in bold) and my, less important, comments begin, but I can’t find an edit button to fix that.

Mark22
3 months ago
Reply to  Ben Hunt

Thank you so much Ben. If you could, in my first comment, I wanted to make it clear where your quote ended and my comments begin out of respect for you and for clarity’s sake. And great freakin’ note today.

Desperate_Yuppie
3 months ago

Seems like every week I read one of your pieces and say “this is Ben’s best yet”. It’s unusual to see a guy’s fastball keep getting better as the season progresses, but here we are.

Adam
3 months ago

The party holding the constitutional right of legal violence has a consequent duty to “win” by “overwhelming force” if necessary. If the goal of the other party is to meet any violence with an escalation of violence, I fear how this “ends”.

Endemic lawlessness and depravity has shown itself a sure way to provoke the wrath of God on a society.

ike
ike
3 months ago

Remind me Ben, how much did the Fed expand its balance sheet in response to the comet of Lucifer’s Hammer, and how much higher was the S&P 500 after the comet strike?

brosenau
3 months ago

Another verse comes to mind: “And if a house be divided against itself that house cannot stand.”

Flat Arthur
3 months ago

Excellent work Ben. I’m not aware of any other source besides Epsilon Theory that can generate 1,000+ word posts at a 100% MUST READ rate. In particular, I appreciate how you keep drawing our attention to what’s NOT happening right now. There is no national drive to find creative ways to make in person education more viable. There is no national drive to make distance learning more engaging and effective. There is no national drive to offer schooling/care for households that cannot generate sufficient income & facilitate distance learning. There is no national drive to drastically improve the safety of in person voting. There is no national drive to drastically improve the reliability & faith in mail-in voting. And as you point out in this note, there is no full hearted national effort to diffuse the current civil unrest. Keep it up! And please help us find more levers to BITFD. There is no system patch that can rehabilitate the current political/financial/social order.

Brian Patno
3 months ago
Reply to  Flat Arthur

You must vote this November. I do not agree with Burning systems down. I support the current Capitalistic and rights of the people with a restrictive government since government has killed more people in the World than any other system. We have a choice this November for restrictive government or government controls everything. If you think government cannot get more control then obviously you missed Zoom (ZM) going up 50% today and from 108 on April 7 to 453 today.

Tobin Hartnell
3 months ago

Another good post. The way it began raised a flag. The post-apocalyptic world with IEDs is Iraq’s everyday. My wife is currently in post-ISIL territory working on our archaeology project. Tomorrow a member of the team goes to Kirkuk, where an IED just took out a police car. The ego telling various militias to BITFD is our every day. Ben’s comments on Ego helped me understand Hobbes’ brutalism. It never seemed viable a strategy, but of course this note shows how viable it can be in the short-term. Our goal in Iraq is to stop BITFD, so that the killing stops and the community can heal. We need the narrator. I appreciate Ben’s solution for the US, a form of reset election that functions as catharsis. However, at least short term, elections don’t solve anything here in Iraq. It is becoming clear to me that in as far as communities are disenfranchised, the reset election can never solve the problem. When elections simultaneously favor competition and favor national politics, this also disenfranchises local communities who are told what to be, rather than listened to. Now imagine that our archaeology team in Iraq needs not only the usual IRB ethics reviews, but also the permission of Cultural Heritage managers, militias, police, and the governor to even have a conversation with the community about archaeology. In such a situation, disengagement is the easiest path but of course it solves nothing. We are unarmed, so BITFD is not an option. Trigger strategies are… Read more »

Canid
3 months ago

Several years ago, in the run up to 2016, I worked on a volunteer, web-based website with about 30 other people. As things got heated on the political front heading into mid-year, the ownership team was trying to figure out how to handle what was going to be a contentious election internally. There were plenty of calls to have no chatter in internal channels (email/Slack) about the election.

We didn’t do that.

We built a dedicated venue for people to talk about the election so it could be contained to one location, but still expressed so that the people, the participants could have their voice heard within the system, not repressed out of it. And then we didn’t allow conservation on the election outside of that locale. And I think this is analogous to what is recommended here.

The answer is to encourage the participation through channels designed to allow for self-determination, and actually allowing that change to take place if so demanded. But also, it’s about preventing the forms of expression that do not seek a true change, but just want to watch the world burn.

Create avenues for the will of the people to be freely and truly expressed, and then hold the line on this who do not actually wish for change but simply want to feel the rush of emotion attached to the moment.

aa547
3 months ago

I’d feel more comfortable about using the National Guard if the local police and DHS Goonsquad hadn’t acted exactly like children getting to LARP their favorite video game.

BostonDad
3 months ago

one group fights the power, one group IS the power.

The violence, albeit distasteful, is finally generating true examination of the inequities in society. What should be happening is all of the downtrodden groups, those that have been left behind, poor white and black, should be coalescing behind a push for change. Instead, many of those that are in bad shape have thrown in with the group that has continued to oppress them.
Sad.

DougENuff
3 months ago

Great Work, Ben, hope you are feeling better these days.
Lucifers’ Hammer! Niven was a neighbor of a client who left me his battered copy. Inspired me to get the How Things Work collection (not in my septic tank, btw).
Highly recommend those who want to Be Prepared get a set.

jb00212000
3 months ago

What would make one think that the Narrator can overcome the Ego?

What would make one think that the species that runs on “adrenaline and endorphins and the rush of cops and robbers” is going to subject itself to that which is not fun? 

Has the old trend-follower (what’s the strategy’s basis?) come to see market participants (that is, man) as “rational”?

Really? How do adrenaline and endorphins work?

John Little
3 months ago

Today’s comet is sentient, adept at both provoking and prolonging conflict. Accommodation and containment would each require elites to act contrary to their interests, although you can bet that an escalation of the police state in the person of “sheer numbers of trained public safety officers” will be acceptable to them. What’s plan B?

cswilson
2 months ago

As a guy with a garage full of motorcycles, you almost lost me with “motorcycle gang”, but then as I read on the “gang” started to look pretty good by comparison.

I have been of the opinion for a long time that both major political parties were destroying themselves, and I have long desired for that to happen to create space for what comes next. I don’t have a crystal ball about timing, but the decay is irreversible.

TyB
TyB
2 months ago

As always, I enjoyed reading this piece, and have thought of it frequently over the last 3 days. Only one portion concerned me, the snap election. It makes more sense to me in a parliamentary system, where no confidence votes can bring elections quickly. I worry about “rewarding” violence by triggering an election out-of-sequence. Behavior that is rewarded is encouraged, and I don’t want to encourage losers to see violence as a means to trigger an election and therefore a different outcome. I feel much better about, for example, a recall petition where one is provided. As Pres. Obama said, “Elections have consequences.” He didn’t say they were all good. And, in that vein, I believe some of the hyperbole that has followed Trump’s unfortunate election has helped justify the current round of violence. In my youth way, way back in the ’80s, it felt like there was more of a sense of the loyal opposition, who will argue policy and wait for the next election, because there is always another election. Let’s go back to that model.

Aaron Coates
2 months ago

You might consider Rob Bell’s historical context on turning the other cheek, including the social issues of that time.

Starts 8 minutes in.
https://robbell.podbean.com/e/episode-142-the-thing-in-the-air-part-4-an-introduction-to-3rd-way/

Sure, turning the other cheek is the original OG non-violent protest. But, it is SO much more. It’s at least the OG metagame.

That MORE gives added form to much of what’s expressed here.  

It might give some of the pack a new frame of reference on your metagame. It certainly did for me, as I’ve had plenty of opportunities to trial it over the past 6+ years.

Michael Benson
2 months ago

Personally, the reason there is such a fight for the controls of party or general government machinery is that there is too much power to be had in controlling the Leviathan. To diffuse the power, so irrespective of whom controls what will matter little, is the only way the experiment continues.

It is doing simple things, like repealing the 16th and 17th amendment, getting rid of our central bank monetary control masters, etc., etc. The lessening of centralized powers that exists within the general government, the more that power will be diffused back down to state/local/individual levels and will allow individuals/smaller groups to exercise power over their own destiny. Then we won’t continue the back and forth faux (Fascist/Marxist – the European political spectrum) right/left control arguments over whom captain’s the ship and spin back to the (total control/anarchy US political spectrum) that was practiced pre-early 20th century progressive era.

Radical reduction of central government control mechanisms is the only way to burn it down and avoid the catastrophe. The pitch to the people for this has to be made. All else is playing around the edges and spitting in the wind…

Zerocoupon
2 months ago

Can you expound why you dismiss Unity 2020? In the gist of the perfect being the enemy of the good, it seems attractive.

The Latest From Epsilon Theory

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.