It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Market

This piece is written by a third party because we think highly of the author and their perspective.


Want to continue reading this and the other 1,500+ essays you won't find anywhere else?




Already a subscriber? log in here

To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.

Comments

  1. Liquidity is there until it isn’t! All of us with decades of debt capital markets experience have, or should have, learned this lesson many times over. This time will be the mother of all lessons I fear…

  2. Thanks Peter.

    I’m having trouble seeing my way out of the Fed’s dilemma. They’ve signaled infinite willingness to plunge fingers into new holes emerging in the decaying bulwark that is the US economy. Powell even pulled out his version of Draghi’s bazooka with his “whatever it takes” statement from the latest FOMC. Legislative limitations on Fed purchases are cheap signals; I have no faith that they won’t be dropped in a heartbeat if deemed expedient.

    The (retail) market currently believes in the Powell Put. Ben’s comments that markets have become a political utility are also salient. Practically, that means that any excess money in retail hands will continue to flood into stocks, since “stonks always go up” (h/t WSB, my collapsitarian excess porn of choice). The ensuing situation keeps playing out in my mind as a one-sided game of chicken, where Powell keeps trying to swerve out of the way of the retail investor’s car, but the investor swerves every time to max, all the way to the inevitable climax.

    The climax in the case? Definitely asset price inflation beyond anything we’ve seen, up until Powell’s prime directives become more important than supporting stocks.

    My take on Powell’s directives is: 1) Extract maximal golden eggs from the goose (Read: US economy) without killing it; 2) Avoid effective oversight; 3+) the familiar ones like price stability, etc…

    Assuming that order is halfway accurate at some point the golden goose’s life support will start the long beep, and the Powell Put will end dramatically. Between here and there, there will obviously be rampant inflation in narrow speculative assets.

    Just thinking out loud here. Any comments?

  3. *investor always swerves to MATCH

  4. Hey I remember that movie !
    Great Piece ……Thank you…

    For what its worth, I believe that interest rates for the past few decades have been unable to stimulate the real economy….
    Here’s a quote from Peter Drucker, circa 2001 :

    The idea that the Federal Reserve chairman has power is a delusion. The only power he has is over the interest rate, and the interest rate has ceased to be important because businesses are no longer dependent upon borrowing from banks. The interest rate is only important to the stock market, to people that short or buy on margin. For the economy – yes, if it goes up to 18% or down to 2%, but half a point is a symbolic gesture. The Fed has control only as long as people trust that when Greenspan opens his mouth, it is meaningful. But the first time it does not work – well, magicians get no second chance."

    For a more contemporary movie, may I suggest Idiocracy [2006] …particularly the clip where President Camacho talks about the economy….

  5. Thanks Peter. I just got my bias confirmation fix for the week.

    No mention of It’s a Mad,Mad, Mad,Mad World gets past me without a shout out to Dick Shawn. " I’m coming Mama".

    Smiling all the way on the commute to the kitchen for more java, thanks again.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

Participants

Avatar for nickallen Avatar for pcecchini Avatar for cartoox Avatar for tromares Avatar for simonsonmeister

The Latest From Epsilon Theory

DISCLOSURES

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.