Cards of Control and a Brave Little Toaster

2+

Returning to the 2017-vintage Rabbit Hole format: No grand theme this week, just some links I thought were noteworthy.


Cards of Control

If you only read one thing this week read this 👉Cards
of control: How ZTE helps Venezuela create China-style social control
. This is an exceptionally
well-sourced long form article on the implementation and implications of ZTE ID
cards in Venezuela.


Decentralized Identity: Ideology & Architecture

If you want to understand self-sovereign identity I think this is
about as good a primer presentation as any. It is no more than
a 15 minute read time even if you are new to digital identity and, I think,
hits the major points in a sensible way.

Btw: don’t be put off by the ‘Bitcoin Association of Switzerland’
logo on the cover … there is no further mention of bitcoin (or Switzerland) in
the presentation.


Going Underground, as a Toaster

Despite writing in recent weeks
of the rise and reach of ‘the Chinese system’, I don’t believe we will actually
get full, unavoidable surveillance in most of the real world any time soon.

For most people in the general populace (i.e. groups who are not
specifically and intensively targeted) of most countries the rise in
surveillance tech just means staying outside the surveillance system will be
inconvenient not impossible, and so most people won’t bother.

For example, if you want to stay out of the video recognition
system you (sort of) just have to put a ‘adversarial perturbation’ sticker on
your head – see link here for how to get yourself
classified as a toaster. For a more technical explanation of why you can get
yourself classified as a toaster, or panda, or whatever, there is a good paper here.

This is also why I think real world ID and app data are currently
much more effective surveillance techniques than video as video processing is
still expensive, imprecise and hackable. But video surveillance still gets the
headlines as it just feels so much more like surveillance.


Defining and Designing Fair Algorithms

While researching SB-10 bill (referenced in last week’s Rabbit
Hole here)
I found Stanford Computational Policy Lab and their work on SB-10 and then their presentation on Defining and Designing
Fair Algorithms – check it out, it’s  long (112 pages), but really
good work.


Sinister News Readers

And, finally, there is something deeply sinister about this Chinese
news bot

(scroll down to the YouTube video to see it in action). I think the sinister
thing is something so human-like presenting news with no conscience of regard
for ‘truth’ (>> insert preferred partisan joke here<<) … I don’t
know, just deeply, deeply sinister in a Minsky / Shannon Ultimate / Useless Machine kind of way.


2+

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Disclosures

This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.

This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities.

This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.