Apocalypse Always

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is apocalypse-always-4x3-1.png


Let us not be naive.

Elections have played host to violent and existential rhetoric since, well, forever.

The second contested American presidential election – the 1800 contest between Adams and Jefferson – was overrun by it. Congressional chaplain William Linn warned Americans that electing Jefferson would insult Washington’s ashes, destroy religion, and loosen all the bonds of society1. Good Christians were cautioned against “indifference” to the “impending danger” of America’s “ruin” that would come at his hands, and reminded that they could not vote for Jefferson without “betraying [the] Lord.” The Jeffersonian camp, only a few years removed from Thomas’s reminder to Adams’s own son-in-law about the bloody manure of patriots and tyrants so necessary to water the tree of liberty, told Americans that the “hideous hermaphroditic character” of the oppressor2 Adams would certainly launch a war with France and centralize tyrannical authority in the presidency. After all, he was secretly plotting to marry his children off to foreign princes in order to establish a lasting Adams monarchy in America.

The response of the Adams administration to these affronts was to use the newly printed Alien and Sedition Acts to throw just about anyone who levied such spicy language against the administration in jail. James Callender, the muckraker-for-hire who published the Reynolds Pamphlet you may remember from the musical Hamilton (“have you read this shit?”), was fined and jailed for his claims that Adams would be the End of the RepublicTM. Another supporter heard a gunshot at a parade in Jersey, was overheard remarking that he “hoped it hit Adams in the ass”, and got slapped with a citation for that bit of cheek, too. After a couple dozen such cases of what we might today call brazen lawfare (and after a couple journalists got their printing presses roughed up by violent mobs), the citizens of Kentucky and Virginia had had enough. Madison and Jefferson quietly acted as the pen behind the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which asserted the right of states to nullify what they saw as unconstitutional laws like the Alien and Sedition Acts. In yet another salvo of counter-battery fire, one of George Washington’s final observations before his death was to assert that Jefferson and Madison threatened to “dissolve the union” through these actions3.

Politicians, ministers, public figures, journalists, statesmen, and garden variety assholes have been threatening the End of the RepublicTM since the Beginning of the Republic. We are always beset by tyrants, demagogues, would-be dictators and monarchs, buffoons, cretins, devils, demons, infidels, foreign agents, Missourians, and narcissists. Should our opponents triumph, it has always meant the end of democracy, of our identity as a Christian nation, of the American Dream, of our way of life, of freedom and liberty and Chevrolets and Capitalism and love and puppies. Of America.

When Henry Clay handed John Quincy Adams the Presidency over Andrew Jackson in 1824, it was the first of several “corrupt bargains” that we would come to associate with the presidency for the next two centuries. To the Jacksonians and the press in their camp, Adams and the Democratic-Republicans were cheaters, liars, and thieves, inheritors to an illegitimate government that harbored dangerous imperial visions. In 1896, industrialists rent their garments and publicized claims that William Jennings Bryan would create an economic apocalypse. Bryan, in his turn, far more famously accused McKinley of crucifying humanity on a cross of gold. McKinley got himself shot, of course, only it wasn’t really a Bryan supporter who did it so much as an anarchist. Not that this stopped anyone from creating the more convenient Narrative.

A decade later, Roosevelt accused Taft of being a traitor to Republican ideals. In return, Taft gave a speech in April 1912 which he claimed that in Teddy the American people were “in danger of a dictator” who would “cling like a leech to the White House and never leave it.” Woodrow Wilson used the opportunity to make sure everyone knew that electing him was therefore the only way to save democracy, and Eugene Debs made sure everyone knew that the whole lot of them were just in it for Wall Street. William McKinley, dead for more than a decade, apparently used the opportunity to appear as a ghost to tell John Shrank to shoot Teddy dead. He failed.

A couple decades later, Hoover told us that FDR would destroy the foundations of the American way of life, while FDR told us that he was the only one that could save capitalism from itself. A couple decades after that, LBJ greenlit that ‘Daisy Girl’ ad to make sure Americans knew that a vote for Goldwater was a vote for global thermonuclear war, a view MLK was happy to co-sign in his assertions that a Goldwater presidency would be “suicidal” not just for America but the world. And all that’s skipping a certain period between 1861-1865 and just about every period in which some trigger-happy arm of the US government decided that it was done tolerating strikes, protests, or demonstrations.

So no, let us not be naive. There is nothing new under the sun. Politicians and the media have been blinding Americans with existential, violent rhetoric and threats since they realized that fear and hatred are pretty powerful forces when it comes to getting people to vote the way you want them to.

Let us also not be naive by pretending that there is no relationship between the purposeful escalation of language and the violent ends it contemplates. The propaganda to which we subject ourselves and our countrymen is infinitely more common and vastly more effective than agitprop from foreign belligerents. The origin of these very pages lies in the clear, unmistakable linguistic patterns observable historically in mass media which create the Common Knowledge that the moral threshold for violence has been met. It is a bit harder to know where the threshold between talking about the necessity of violence and actual violence is for the public than it is for a government hell-bent on engineering support for a military action it knows it will take. OK, it’s a lot harder. So no predictions here.

Just a warning.


Want to continue reading this and the other 1,500+ essays you won't find anywhere else?




Already a subscriber? log in here

To learn more about Epsilon Theory and be notified when we release new content sign up here. You’ll receive an email every week and your information will never be shared with anyone else.

Comments

  1. I don’t know how universal this experience was, but here goes nothing.

    I had that one friend in high school, the inexplicable straight A student, the pothead (before pot was legal and lame), the son of a successful lawyer and a psychologist mother, the overweight funny guy, the guy that every other guy liked but that girls wouldn’t look at. Him.

    He had a mid-90’s Chevy Lumina. It was the kind of car high school kids used to drive, back when adults understood that money was a thing and that no, your child does not need to be driving a brand new Mustang Mach E GT in high school. Anyway, he was not a great driver. On surface roads you didn’t really worry much because there’s only so much harm that can be done while going 32 MPH in heavy traffic. But if you had the misfortune to climb into his car for a trip that involved a highway, well, Godspeed. I learned this lesson once (a repeat was not necessary) when we were going to get wings on a Tuesday night. Despite the fact that his car couldn’t hit 90 MPH if you dropped it out of a plane, he still managed to hit speeds that were decidedly unsafe for the minimally-engineered chassis to handle were there to be a need to suddenly swerve or change direction in any meaningful way. The one thing I recall from that ultimately uneventful ride: the feeling of being completely out of control while danger built all around me. Asking him to slow down did nothing. Demanding that he pay attention to the road rather than search for his lighter was fruitless. It wasn’t until I found his pipe, rolled down the window, and threatened to toss it out that he slowed down and drove like a semi responsible person. My fellow passengers were grateful, though they only expressed that in private.

    We’re all on that dark highway, in one of GM’s biggest piece of shit cars, on cheap tires without much tread left, and we’re barreling towards something we can’t see up ahead. No bi-xenon headlights, no driver assistance, no dual crumple zones, no array of airbags. And so far nobody has been able to talk the driver out of what feels like his suicide mission. Tick tock.

  2. 100%
    Trip down memory lane for me too

  3. Avatar for KCP KCP says:

    Lord it’s great to read something at 9:50 am on a Sunday and laugh out loud! After reading i feel like i’m stepping out of that Lumina (in your story)…well written!

    As far as the future, yeah, it’s going to be a rough road. I just don’t know how any leader addresses our issues which are becoming more glaring and acknowledged by more people, albeit slowly.

    Does our Lumina snap a wheel lug on that curve? Does it simply run out of gas? Or do we get to our destination unscathed but scared shitless?

  4. Avatar for rguinn rguinn says:

    A good story-based reminder that it’s sometimes enough to know the severity even if you don’t know the incidence.

  5. I am of an age that I’m sure at some point my high school experience included a ride in somebody’s Ford Pinto, a car in which the danger came not from what’s ahead but from what the accelerationists are barreling up in from behind.

    In keeping with the thread here’s some of what’s in the rear view mirror.

    The Apocalypse Ball is this weekend.

  6. Here’s a recap from the Ball if you’d like to see accelerationists accelerating. Edge thinkers out in force, Palmer Luckey among them.

    I honestly think this kind of “freeballing” - to swipe a term from Rogan - is kinda cool in an Apple/“Think Different” kind of way.

    Lol’d at what Claude gets up to when bored…

  7. I hope this gives us hope!, just an example of someone trying to fight the extreme language in their own way, by calling his flock to something higher than us.

Continue the discussion at the Epsilon Theory Forum

Participants

Avatar for rguinn Avatar for Desperate_Yuppie Avatar for RobMann Avatar for Cactus_Ed Avatar for Patel1975 Avatar for KCP

The Latest From Epsilon Theory

DISCLOSURES
This commentary is being provided to you as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. The opinions expressed in these materials represent the personal views of the author(s). It is not investment research or a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. Any action that you take as a result of information contained in this document is ultimately your responsibility. Epsilon Theory will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information. Consult your investment advisor before making any investment decisions. It must be noted, that no one can accurately predict the future of the market with certainty or guarantee future investment performance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Statements in this communication are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are as of the date of this publication. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. The views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. Epsilon Theory disclaims any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities. This commentary has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. Epsilon Theory recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial advisor. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.